PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026Nucleic Acids Research0 citationsOpen Access

Diversity and distribution of bacterial DNA polymerases

View Full Paper
KTKęstutis TiminskasDKDarius KazlauskasATAlbertas Timinskas

Key Points

  • The aim is to systematically explore the diversity and distribution of bacterial DNA polymerases.
  • Computationally identified and characterized DNA polymerases from over 3000 bacterial species.
  • Classified polymerases into A, B, C, X, and Y families.
  • Annotated distinct groups, proofreading nucleases, and interaction motifs.
  • Used AlphaFold modeling to identify multimeric complexes.
  • Y-family polymerases are the most abundant, followed by C and A families.
  • 96% of bacterial species have A-family polymerases; 88% have Y-family members.
  • Identified 11 types of putative multimeric error-prone DNA polymerases.
  • Distribution patterns are influenced by bacterial lineages and environmental conditions.

Abstract

DNA polymerases are key players in DNA replication, repair, and maintenance. However, the overall abundance, diversity, and distribution of bacterial DNA polymerases have not been systematically explored. To close this knowledge gap, we computationally identified and characterized DNA polymerases and their homologs from A, B, C, X, and Y families in over 3000 representative bacterial species with complete genomes. We found that Y-family is the most abundant, followed by C and A families, whereas B and X families are rare. All species have replicative C-family polymerases, 96% have A-family polymerases, and 88% have Y-family members. In each family, we identified and annotated distinct groups, proofreading nucleases, and interaction motifs. Based on conserved associations for DnaE2 and Y-family groups, we identified 11 types of putative multimeric error-prone DNA polymerases supported by AlphaFold modeling. Approximately 90% of the complexes belong to four major types, exemplified by Meiothermus silvanus PolY-RecA complex, Mycobacterium tuberculosis ImuA-ImuB-DnaE2, Escherichia coli Pol V (UmuC-UmuD'2-RecA), and Bacillus subtilis YqjW-YqjX-RecA. We found that distribution patterns of distinct polymerase groups and multimeric complexes are shaped by bacterial lineages, replication-system types, and environmental factors. Our results thus provide a comprehensive picture of DNA polymerase diversity and distribution across the bacterial domain.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Timinskas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e911bf5123be5ed04e766https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkag133
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1DNA Polymerases2010 · 37 citations
  2. 2New insights into the structures and interactions of bacterial Y-family DNA polymerases2019 · 50 citations
  3. 3Noncanonical prokaryotic X family DNA polymerases lack polymerase activity and act as exonucleases2022 · 9 citations
  4. 4Bacterial replicases and related polymerases2011 · 58 citations
  5. 5Essential roles for imuA ′- and imuB -encoded accessory factors in DnaE2-dependent mutagenesis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis2010 · 131 citations