PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026Otology & Neurotology0 citations

The Impact of Preset Baseline Middle Ear Pressure on Tubomanometry and Sonotubometry in Healthy Subjects

View Full Paper
YLYunxin LuAYAilin YinJPJiashun Peng

Key Points

  • To assess how baseline middle ear pressure influences Eustachian tube opening detection with tubomanometry and sonotubometry in healthy subjects.
  • Eighty-three healthy volunteers participated, providing 166 ears for analysis.
  • Tympanometry was conducted to determine balanced middle ear pressure (MEP) ranges.
  • Participants underwent tubomanometry and sonotubometry under varied MEP conditions: balanced, positive, and negative.
  • R-values were significantly higher under negative MEP compared to balanced MEP at 30 mbar (median difference +0.22; P <0.001).
  • Eustachian tube opening detection via tubomanometry was notably better under negative MEP at 30 mbar (OR 3.67; P <0.05).
  • TMM sensitivity ranged from 0.93 to 0.97 under negative MEP, but specificity was low (0.20 to 0.60).

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the impact of baseline middle ear pressure (MEP) on the detection of Eustachian tube (ET) opening using tubomanometry (TMM) and sonotubometry (STM) in subjects with healthy ET function. Tympanometry is used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of TMM. Methods: Eighty-three healthy volunteers (166 ears) underwent tympanometry to establish balanced MEP ranges. For eligible ears, balanced MEP (b-MEP), positive MEP (p-MEP), and negative MEP (n-MEP) were induced through standardized maneuvers. All subjects completed STM and TMM under 3 MEP conditions, with tympanometry performed before and after each procedure. Results: R -values were significantly higher under n-MEP conditions when compared with b-MEP at 30 mbar (median difference +0.22; P 0.05). Conclusions: The baseline MEP significantly affects TMM assessments, with elevated R -values under n-MEP indicating delayed ET opening, while improving TMM sensitivity. Conversely, STM maintains consistent ET opening rates and acoustic parameters across MEP conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e9177f5123be5ed04efe4https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000004862
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper