PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Health risk assessment of exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in bread from Iranian markets: Application of monte carlo simulation approach

View Full Paper
NKNajmeh KhodadadiMashhad University of Medical SciencesMSMasoumeh SaghiMashhad University of Medical SciencesSMSina MashayekhiMashhad University of Medical Sciences

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess health risks associated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in bread from Iranian markets.
  • Collected 96 bread samples from traditional and industrial bakeries
  • Quantified 16 priority PAHs using GC-MS and microwave-assisted saponification
  • Conducted Monte Carlo simulations with 100,000 iterations for risk characterization
  • Calculated daily dietary exposure and incremental lifetime cancer risk
  • Mean Σ₁₆PAHs were significantly higher in traditional breads (68.63 µg/kg) than industrial breads (39.87 µg/kg)
  • Lavash bread had the highest PAH levels (66.58 µg/kg)
  • Probabilistic assessment indicated acceptable to low carcinogenic risk, higher for traditional baking
  • Sensitivity analysis identified BaP as the primary contributor to risk

Abstract

Background Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are persistent environmental contaminants formed during high-temperature processing of food and are associated with both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effects. Methods A total of 96 bread samples (Lavash, Sangak, and Barbari) were collected from industrial and traditional bakeries across eight municipal zones of Mashhad, Iran. Sixteen priority PAHs were quantified by GC-MS after microwave-assisted saponification and DLLME clean-up. Toxic equivalent concentrations (BaPeq), daily dietary exposure, incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR), and Monte Carlo probabilistic modelling (100,000 iterations) were used for risk characterisation. Results Mean Σ₁₆PAHs were significantly higher in traditional breads (68.63 ± 4.57 µg/kg) than industrial breads (39.87 ± 3.68 µg/kg; p < 0.001), with Lavash showing the highest levels (66.58 ± 6.02 µg/kg) and Sangak the lowest (40.95 ± 1.63 µg/kg). Naphthalene dominated light PAHs; fluoranthene and pyrene were predominant heavy PAHs. Mean BaP concentrations (0.05–0.10 µg/kg) were below the EU limit of 1 µg/kg. Mean TEQ was 0.18 µg/kg, with BaP contributing ~58%. Probabilistic assessment showed acceptable to low carcinogenic risk, slightly higher for traditional baking. Sensitivity analysis identified BaP as the primary driver. Compared globally, PAH levels in these Iranian breads indicate an acceptable risk, though continued monitoring and regulation are needed. Conclusion Current PAH exposure via bread in Mashhad is generally acceptable, but traditional baking markedly increases contamination. Transition to indirect-heating ovens, improved ventilation, and regular monitoring are recommended to minimise exposure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khodadadi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e918df5123be5ed04f294https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341584
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Investigation into the formation of PAHs in foods prepared in the home to determine the effects of frying, grilling, barbecuing, toasting and roasting2015 · 205 citations
  2. 2Food-Borne Chemical Carcinogens and the Evidence for Human Cancer Risk2022 · 79 citations
  3. 3Health risk assessment on dietary exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Taiyuan, China2010 · 324 citations
  4. 4Formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their growth to soot—a review of chemical reaction pathways2000 · 1,808 citations
  5. 5Concentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in bread and health risk assessment across the globe: A systematic review and meta‐analysis2024 · 12 citations