PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

A novel risk-scoring system based on endoscopic ultrasound and clinical characteristics for the preoperative diagnosis of small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

View Full Paper
LLLuojie LiuYFYunfu FengSZSijie Zheng

Key Points

  • Develop and validate a risk-scoring system for diagnosing small gastric GISTs using endoscopic ultrasound and clinical characteristics.
  • Retrospective analysis of 1303 patients with gastric submucosal tumors
  • Divided into training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts
  • Compared clinical and EUS characteristics of small GISTs and non-GIST SMTs
  • Constructed risk-scoring model using independent predictive factors identified by multivariate logistic regression
  • Assessed model performance using area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.
  • GISTs accounted for 47.1% of cases analyzed
  • Risk-scoring model showed AUC of 0.776 in internal and 0.844 in external validation cohorts
  • Sensitivities were 0.867 for internal and 0.828 for external cohorts
  • Low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk lesions were identified in both cohorts, reflecting effective risk stratification.

Abstract

The preoperative differentiation of small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) from other submucosal lesions remains clinically challenging due to overlapping endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) features. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel risk-scoring system integrating EUS imaging and clinical characteristics to improve preoperative diagnostic accuracy for small gastric GISTs versus non-GIST submucosal tumors. We retrospectively analyzed 1303 patients with gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs), who were divided into a training cohort (n = 670), an internal validation cohort (n = 287), and an external validation cohort (n = 346). Clinical and EUS characteristics were compared between small GISTs and non-GIST SMTs. Independent predictive factors identified through multivariate logistic regression were used to construct a risk-scoring model. The model’s diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and accuracy. Small gastric GISTs accounted for 614 cases (47.1%). Four independent predictors were identified: tumor location in the cardia/fundus (1 points), origin within the muscularis propria (2 points), hypoechoic echogenicity (1 point), and extraluminal growth pattern (2 points). The scoring system demonstrated strong discriminatory power, with AUCs of 0.776 (95%CI: 0.727–0.826) in the internal and 0.844 (95%CI: 0.805–0.884) in the external validation cohorts. Sensitivities were 0.867 (95%CI: 0.800–0.918) and 0.828 (95%CI: 0.767–0.878), and NPVs were 0.827 and 0.785, respectively. Risk stratification revealed that in the internal cohort, 17.3% of lesions were low-risk (0–2 points), 52.8% intermediate-risk (3–4 points), and 96.2% high-risk (5–6 points). Corresponding proportions in the external cohort were 21.5%, 73.9%, and 95.0%. The proposed EUS-based risk-scoring system shows robust performance in preoperatively diagnosing small gastric GISTs. It holds promise for improving clinical decision-making and optimizing treatment strategies by enabling non-invasive and accurate risk stratification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699f95951bc9fecf3dab3858https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41599-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper