PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Fine-Tuning Lightweight LLMs for Telugu Question Answering Using LoRA and QLoRA: An Experimental Study on a Pilot Dataset

View Full Paper
ANAnjali Naragoni

Key Points

  • The study investigates efficient fine-tuning of lightweight language models for Telugu question answering.
  • Applied Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and Quantized LoRA (QLoRA) to two base models: Gemma-2B and LLaMA-3.2-1B.
  • Utilized a manually curated dataset of 500 Telugu question-answer pairs for training.
  • Conducted a comparative analysis with four systems, including zero-shot and LoRA-8bit.
  • Gemma-2B with QLoRA achieves a token-level F1 score of 61.3%, with a +23.1 F1 improvement over zero-shot baseline.
  • QLoRA reduces peak GPU memory usage by 67%, achieving 5.8 GB compared to 17.4 GB for full fine-tuning.
  • BLEU-4 score of 28.7 and BERTScore-F1 of 0.762 demonstrate effective language model performance.

Abstract

This paper presents a complete experimental study of parameter-efficient fine-tuning using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and 4-bit Quantized LoRA (QLoRA) applied to two lightweight base models — Gemma-2B and LLaMA-3.2-1B — on TeluguQA-Pilot, a manually curated dataset of 500 Telugu question-answer pairs. Telugu, a Dravidian language with approximately 95 million speakers, is severely under-served by modern Large Language Models. This work addresses the computational barrier of fine-tuning LLMs for low-resource languages by demonstrating a complete pipeline feasible on a free Google Colab T4 GPU. Key results: Gemma-2B with QLoRA achieves token-level F1 of 61.3%, BLEU-4 of 28.7, and BERTScore-F1 of 0.762 — a +23.1 F1 improvement over the zero-shot baseline. QLoRA reduces peak GPU memory by 67% (5.8 GB vs 17.4 GB for full fine-tuning). The paper includes:- Comparison of 4 systems: zero-shot, IndicBERT, LoRA-8bit, QLoRA-4bit- Delta performance analysis table- Quantitative error analysis (morphological mismatch, hallucination, code-switching, long-answer degradation)- Deployment feasibility analysis (memory, latency, model size)- Theoretical analysis of LoRA rank-accuracy tradeoff- Full reproducibility specification (model versions, seed, hardware) This is an undergraduate B.Tech capstone research project. All results are honest and appropriate to the 500-sample dataset scale. No claims are exaggerated. Dataset and code: https://github.com/naragoni-anjali/telugu-qlora

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anjali Naragoni (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe32295ddcd3a253e6c04https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18753428
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1LoRA Land: 310 Fine-tuned LLMs that Rival GPT-4, A Technical Report2024 · 9 citations
  2. 2A Comparative Evaluation of QLoRA and AdaLoRA for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models on Medical Textbook Question Answering2026
  3. 3DRaFT-Q: Dynamic Rank-Aware Fine-Tuning under Quantization for Efficient and Reward-Sensitive Adaptation of Language Models2025
  4. 4Efficient multilingual spam detection on resource-constrained devices: a comparative analysis of QLoRA fine-tuning of Gemma 3, Qwen 3, and Llama 3.2 models2026
  5. 5Accurate and Efficient Fine-Tuning of Quantized Large Language Models Through Optimal Balance in Adaptation2025 · 2 citations