PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Enhancing Interval Forecasting Accuracy of Iraqi Stock Market Prices based on v-support vector regression

NANoor Adnan AbdullahZAZakariya Yahya Algamal

Key Points

  • The research aims to enhance the accuracy of stock price forecasts in the Iraqi market using an interval-valued model.
  • Developed an interval-valued forecasting model for stock prices using v-support vector regression (VSVR) with COA optimization.
  • Constructed interval time series with lower and upper price bounds to model uncertainty.
  • Compared performance of COA-VSVR against grid search and cross-validation methods on training and testing data.
  • COA-VSVR achieved superior forecast accuracy metrics for center and radius compared to baseline methods.
  • On training data, COA-VSVR showed MAE=0.158 and RMSE=0.253 for center forecasts and MAE=0.169 and RMSE=0.264 for radius forecasts.
  • Testing results confirmed the robustness of the model, with statistical validation showing COA-VSVR's superiority at 95% confidence.

Abstract

Stock price forecasting poses significant challenges due to non-stationarity, nonlinearity, and noise in financial markets, particularly for the Iraqi stock exchange. This study proposes an enhanced interval-valued forecasting model for daily prices of the national chemical and plastic industry (WSKB) company (2020–2025) using v-support vector regression (VSVR) with hyperparameters optimized via the coati optimization algorithm (COA). Interval time series are constructed from lower and upper price bounds, modeling center and radius components to capture uncertainty more effectively than point forecasts. The COA approach tunes key VSVR parameters through population-based exploration and exploitation phases inspired by coati hunting behaviors, outperforming grid search (GS-VSVR) and cross-validation (CV-VSVR). On training data (637 days), COA-VSVR achieves superior metrics for center (MAE=0.158, RMSE=0.253, DA=0.665, R²=0.965) and radius (MAE=0.169, RMSE=0.264, DA=0.642, R²=0.957) compared to baselines; testing results (308 days) confirm robustness. Further, Diebold-Mariano tests validate center-based COA-VSVR superiority over radius-based at 95% confidence (p<0.05). Visualizations and error reductions demonstrate the model's practical value for risk-aware investment in volatile emerging markets.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abdullah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe32295ddcd3a253e6c65https://doi.org/10.19139/soic-2310-5070-3316
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper