PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Evaluation Review0 citationsOpen Access

The Pursuit of Social Betterment Through Evaluation Practice: A Review of the Literature on Social Justice-Oriented Evaluation and a Taxonomy of Practices

View Full Paper
SZSarah Zlatkovic

Key Points

  • The aim is to clarify social justice-oriented evaluation and provide a structured taxonomy for practitioners.
  • Conducted a literature review on social justice-oriented evaluation practices
  • Developed a taxonomy of social justice-oriented evaluation (T-SJOE)
  • Provided a framework for understanding these practices
  • Identified key characteristics and descriptions of social justice-oriented evaluation
  • Introduced the taxonomy (T-SJOE) for evaluation practitioners
  • Encouraged further development and application of T-SJOE in evaluation planning

Abstract

There has been an increasing call for social justice, not just in American society but also within the evaluation profession. Scholars and practitioners like Donna Mertens, Stafford Hood, Karen Kirkhart, Veronica Thomas, and many others have led the movement within the evaluation profession to view evaluation practice as a vehicle for social justice. However, descriptions of social justice-oriented evaluation in the literature tend to lack sufficient detail, leaving many evaluators to wonder exactly what social justice-oriented evaluation is. This article presents a summary of the literature on social justice-oriented evaluation, providing a much-needed description of the approach. This paper also introduces a taxonomy of social justice-oriented evaluation (T-SJOE) practices, developed from the results of the literature review, and presents a framework of social justice-oriented evaluation practices as they are currently discussed in the evaluation literature. T-SJOE is not prescriptive or presumed complete but is presented as a tool for self-reflection and as a resource when planning evaluations. Further development of the T-SJOE is expected and encouraged.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sarah Zlatkovic (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe33695ddcd3a253e6d79https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x261428513
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis1965 · 4,641 citations
  2. 2Material Incentives and Other Potential Factors Associated With Response Rates to Internet Surveys of American Evaluation Association Members: Findings From a Randomized Experiment2019 · 28 citations
  3. 3Tackling Wicked Problems in Complex Ecologies2018 · 25 citations
  4. 4Re-purposing evaluation to learn about social justice: Reconfiguring epistemological politics through the regulative ideal of ‘participatory parity’2020 · 11 citations
  5. 5The Role of Evaluation in Affirmative Action–Type Programs2015 · 2 citations