PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Journal of Materials Science Materials in Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Experimental investigation of ferrofluid-based parabolic trough solar collector employing twisted tape under variable flow conditions

JBJanardhan Kashinath BhorJBJayant Bhangale

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the thermo-hydraulic performance of a parabolic trough solar collector using ferrofluid nanofluids.
  • Experimental design using water-based Fe₃O₄ nanofluids with twisted tape inserts
  • Variations in volume fractions of ϕ = 0.01–0.06
  • Testing across a Reynolds number range of 3,000–25,000
  • Assessment of inlet-outlet temperature differences and Nusselt number
  • Significant increase in temperature differences from 7–8 K to 34–37 K with twisted tape inserts
  • Nusselt number increased 2–7 times compared to plain water under certain conditions
  • Friction factor increased by 2–3 times due to enhanced flow characteristics
  • Performance Evaluation Criterion (PEC) values remained above unity, indicating overall efficiency

Abstract

This experimental study examines the thermo-hydraulic performance of a parabolic trough solar collector using water-based Fe₃O₄ nanofluids with twisted tape inserts under simulated solar flux. Fe₃O₄ nanofluids with volume fractions of ϕ = 0.01–0.06 were circulated through a copper absorber tube equipped with twisted tapes of twist ratios (H/D) = 2.8, 3.9, and 5.4 over a Reynolds number range of 3,000–25,000. Compared with plain water, nanofluids produced higher inlet–outlet temperature differences, increasing from about 7–8 K to approximately 34–37 K when combined with twisted tape inserts at lower Reynolds number. The Nusselt number increased markedly with Reynolds number and nanoparticle concentration, reaching approximately 2–7 times that of plain water for combined nanofluid–twisted tape configurations. The friction factor increased by about 2–3.0 times due to enhanced swirl flow and higher effective viscosity. Despite this hydraulic penalty, the Performance Evaluation Criterion remained greater than unity for all cases, with PEC values generally ranging from about 1.42 to 5.18, confirming an overall thermo-hydraulic advantage.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bhor et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe34695ddcd3a253e6fd3https://doi.org/10.1186/s40712-026-00417-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Parabolic trough solar collector technology using TiO2 nanofluids with dimpled tubes2024 · 47 citations
  2. 2Experimental study: the impact of surfactant and nanoparticles concentration on the stability of alumina nanofluids2025 · 6 citations
  3. 3Thermal analysis of v-cut twisted tape fitted heat exchanger: A numerical approach2024 · 8 citations
  4. 4Solar energy status in the world: A comprehensive review2023 · 487 citations
  5. 5Workbench for a Parabolic Trough Solar Collector with a Tracking System2022 · 4 citations