PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Health Affairs Scholar0 citationsOpen Access

Health Access & Prevention Under Arkansas’ Market-Based Medicaid Expansion

View Full Paper
RSRobert SkinnerCLChristopher LouisCFColleen M. Florio

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate healthcare access and preventive service utilization in Arkansas after Medicaid expansion in comparison to states with traditional expansions.
  • Utilized Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from 2011 to 2021.
  • Conducted a difference-in-differences analysis.
  • Examined low-income non-elderly adults aged 18-64 in Arkansas against similar states (Kentucky, Ohio, West Virginia).
  • Analysed outcomes like insurance coverage, usual source of care, annual checkups, cost-related care avoidance, and flu vaccination.
  • Arkansas’ Medicaid expansion resulted in a 3.5 percentage point increase in insurance coverage (p<0.001).
  • Annual checkups increased by 6.1 percentage points in Arkansas (p<0.001).
  • Improvements in usual source of care and flu vaccination rates were comparable between Arkansas and traditional expansion states.
  • Cost-related care avoidance was reduced similarly in both Arkansas and traditional expansion states.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Arkansas expanded Medicaid in 2014 using a Section 1115 waiver that included premium assistance for beneficiaries to purchase private plans through the state’s marketplace. The waiver was modified in 2017 to require partial premium payments and implemented work requirements in mid-2018, which were later rescinded by federal court order. We compared healthcare access and preventive service utilization in Arkansas versus states with traditional Medicaid expansions. Methods Using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from 2011–2021, we applied difference-in-differences analysis to examine low-income non-elderly adults aged 18-64 in Arkansas and three demographically-similar traditionally-expanding states (Kentucky, Ohio, West Virginia). Outcomes included insurance coverage, usual source of care, annual checkups, cost-related care avoidance, and flu vaccination. Results Compared to traditional expansion states, Arkansas’ expansion was associated with greater increases in insurance coverage (+3.5 percentage points, p0.001) and annual checkups (+6.1pp, p0.001). Both groups showed similar improvements in usual source of care and flu vaccination rates, and comparable reductions in avoided care due to cost. Conclusion Pre-existing gaps between Arkansas and traditional expansion states narrowed for insurance coverage and rates of annual checkups, while other outcomes improved in Arkansas at levels comparable to those observed in traditional expansion states. Primary Funding Source Unfunded

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Skinner et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe3f995ddcd3a253e8146https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag045
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper