PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Journal of Biomedical Science1 citationsOpen Access

TRKB-based signature identifies high-risk squamous cell carcinoma cases and TRKB blockade reprograms tumor and stromal cells toward suppressive phenotypes

VBValeria BartolocciACAlessio CaponeRMRosanna Monetta

Key Points

  • This research aims to identify biomarkers for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and explore therapeutic targets.
  • Retrospective analysis of patient specimens using immunohistochemistry to assess TrkB and downstream protein expression.
  • Machine learning and statistical analyses to differentiate cSCC subtypes and patient risk.
  • In vitro studies with TrkB inhibitor ANA-12 on SCC cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs).
  • Assessment of gene and protein expression through RT-qPCR, immunoblotting, and functional assays.
  • The ‘TrkB, E-cadherin, Yap1, Notch1’ signature effectively classifies cSCC subtypes and identifies high-risk cases.
  • Machine learning models showed promising accuracy in distinguishing among cSCC types.
  • TrkB blockade reduced tumorigenic traits in TP53-mutant SCC cells and reprogrammed CAFs to less aggressive phenotypes.
  • Findings promote a tumor-suppressive effect and support tissue homeostasis in relevant 3D models.

Abstract

Abstract Background Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a common age-related cancer, with a subset prone to recurrence and metastasis. Currently, no useful diagnostic biomarkers for high-risk cSCC are available. Based on our previous findings, indicating that age-related changes in the neurotrophin receptor tyrosine kinase-2 (TrkB) axis may promote skin tumorigenesis, this study aims to identify novel cSCC biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on specimens from patients with in situ or invasive cSCCs using immunohistochemistry to assess the expression of TrkB and specific downstream proteins (i.e., E-cadherin, Yap1, and Notch1). Statistical and machine learning analyses were applied to identify biomarkers that distinguish cSCC subtypes and patient risk groups. In vitro studies involved treating SCC cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and three-dimensional (3D) SCC models with the TrkB inhibitor ANA-12. Gene and protein expression were analyzed via RTqPCR, immunoblotting, and immunoassays. Functional assays evaluated cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. Secretomes were profiled using cytokine arrays. Results Protein expression levels mainly correlated with cSCC types. Our findings indicated that the ‘TrkB, E-cadherin, Yap1, Notch1’ signature can be a relevant biomarker for both cSCC subtype classification and identification of high-risk cases. Despite the limited sample size, machine learning models demonstrated promising accuracy in differentiating between cSCC classes. Our analysis also highlighted the added value of including stromal markers for classifying high-risk patients. Furthermore, TrkB blockade suppressed tumorigenic traits in TP53 -mutant SCC cells, including proliferation, EMT, migration, invasiveness, and disruption of the IL-6/STAT3 signaling loop, while promoting differentiation and senescence through modulation of key players such as p63, Yap1, Notch1, and p21. Data are consistent with a tumor-suppressive effect, thereby promoting tissue homeostasis, especially in physiologically relevant 3D models. Inhibiting TrkB reprogrammed primary CAFs into a less proliferative, migratory, inflammatory, and fibrotic phenotype by simultaneously suppressing key activating pathways, such as β-catenin, Yap1, and Notch1. This aligns with a reduction in their tumor-supportive functions. Conclusions Our findings provide a basis for improved high-risk patient stratification by highlighting a TrkB-based signature and generating prototype predictive models. Furthermore, they offer promising therapeutic avenues for developing combined targeted interventions to overcome resistance in high-risk patients. Graphical abstract

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bartolocci et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe3f995ddcd3a253e82a1https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-026-01227-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper