Serum NT-proBNP demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy for heart failure with an AUC of 0.97, 93.0% sensitivity, and 97.7% specificity compared to controls.
Case-Control (n=186)
Yes
Does salivary NT-proBNP and hs-cTnI measurement accurately distinguish heart failure patients from healthy controls compared to serum measurement?
Salivary NT-proBNP and hs-cTnI demonstrate moderate to good diagnostic potential for heart failure, suggesting saliva could serve as a complementary non-invasive monitoring tool.
Effect estimate: AUC 0.97 for serum NT-proBNP (95% CI 0.94-1.00)
p-value: p=<0.001
Background Salivary biomarkers are being explored as non-invasive tools for Heart failure (HF) monitoring. This study examined salivary N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high sensitive cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) alongside serum levels to distinguish heart failure patients from healthy controls and to assess diagnostic potential and cross-matrix concordance. Method This two-center, prospective case-control study (Nov 2024–Apr 2025) enrolled heart failure patients and healthy controls, diagnosed per European Society of Cardiology criteria and confirmed by labs and echocardiography. Serum and saliva N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) were measured by sandwich ELISA. Samples: 100 serum and 47 saliva from patients; 100 serum and 91 saliva from controls. Biomarkers were limited by serum volume (43 patients; 45 controls); saliva was measured in 47 patients and 45 controls. This limitation reduced the sample size for cardiac biomarker analyses relative to the total collected samples. Results HF patients showed higher serum NT-proBNP (309 220–399 ng/L) and salivary NT-proBNP (24 21–29 ng/L) versus controls (77 63–106 ng/L; 18 15–22 ng/L; P
Mohammed et al. (Wed,) conducted a case-control in Heart failure (n=186). Serum NT-proBNP demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy for heart failure with an AUC of 0.97, 93.0% sensitivity, and 97.7% specificity compared to controls.