PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 27, 2026Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology0 citations

Subcortical Stimulation for Functional Brain Mapping: A Systematic Review

View Full Paper
ASAdrian SafaDSDavid S. SabsevitzMMMarco Failla Mulone

Key Points

  • This review aims to clarify the indications and optimal parameters for subcortical functional brain mapping.
  • Conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Searched PubMed, Scopus, and Medline databases for relevant studies.
  • Included studies involving adults undergoing subcortical electrical stimulation.
  • 55 articles involving 249 patients were included in the review.
  • 96.3% of cases involved brain tumors, mainly gliomas and metastases.
  • Bipolar stimulation at 50-60 Hz was preferred, linking to fewer neurological deficits.

Abstract

Purpose: Subcortical functional brain mapping is a valuable technique, especially involving lesions within or near white matter tracts. Motor and language deficits caused by intraoperative damage to these subcortical fibers are associated with worse outcomes. However, there are variable approaches to performing subcortical functional brain mapping. This systematic review was performed to better understand indications and optimal stimulation parameters. Methods: A systematic review was performed by PRISMA guidelines, using PubMed, Scopus, and Medline databases. Search dates ranged from inception to November 30th, 2024. Studies included adults who underwent subcortical electrical stimulation for functional brain mapping. Results: A total of 55 articles (249 patients, mean age 44.8 years, 114 female) were included. The most common pathology was brain tumor (96.3%), primarily gliomas and metastases, and 24.4% of all cases had a history of epilepsy. The most frequently mapped white matter tracts were the arcuate fasciculus, corticospinal/pyramidal tract, and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, involving motor, language, and cognitive functions. Bipolar stimulation (50–60 Hz, 0.5–1 millisecond, 1–10 mA) was preferred over monopolar stimulation. Among 147 patients with outcome data, 89.1% did not suffer permanent adverse outcomes including neurologic deficits, although long-term outcomes were inconsistently reported. Conclusions: The methodologic variability of subcortical functional brain mapping and lack of long-term follow-up reported limits determination of optimal parameter selection for electrical stimulation although common trends are reported. Functional brain mapping approaches may be guided by the tract and network involved. Further studies are needed to develop a standardized approach and more definitive guideline to its performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Safa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a13571ed1d949a99abf485https://doi.org/10.1097/wnp.0000000000001246
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Intra-operative mapping of the subcortical visual pathways using direct electrical stimulations2004 · 92 citations
  2. 2Involvement of the right inferior longitudinal fascicle in visual hemiagnosia: a brain stimulation mapping study2012 · 72 citations
  3. 3Awake minimally invasive parafascicular approach to a language eloquent brain tumour—surgical video2023 · 4 citations
  4. 4Mapping of the internal capsule with subcortical stimulation for gross-total resection of a thalamic metastatic tumor2018 · 3 citations
  5. 5Survival Benefit of Supratotal Resection in a Long-term Survivor of IDH-wildtype Glioblastoma: A Case Report and Literature Review2021 · 4 citations