PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 27, 2026Shoulder & Elbow0 citations

Navigated augmented reality is a valuable tool for precise glenoid component placement in angled bony augmentation reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A case series

View Full Paper
TSTanguy SegersJBJoris BeckersTITom Van Isacker

Key Points

  • This study evaluates the precision of glenoid component placement using navigated augmented reality during reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
  • Analyzed 15 shoulders with severe glenoid erosion undergoing angled BIO-RSA from 2021 to 2023.
  • Utilized preoperative computed tomographic scans for 3D surgical planning.
  • Engaged navigated AR for intraoperative glenoid placement guidance.
  • Conducted postoperative CT scans to assess graft incorporation and compare with preoperative planning.
  • Mean deviation for baseplate version was 4.1° ± 3.4° and 1.9° ± 2.4° for inclination.
  • Baseplate entry-point deviation measured 1.6 mm ± 1.2 mm and 1.1 mm ± 1.1 mm in respective directions.
  • Mean deviation in baseplate offset reconstruction was 2.1 mm ± 1.6 mm.
  • Complete graft incorporation was achieved in all cases.

Abstract

Aims Augmented Reality (AR) guidance has demonstrated improved accuracy in glenoid component placement in both in-vitro and in-vivo settings. In cases of severe glenoid wear, structural bone may allow for defect correction. This study evaluates the accuracy of glenoid component positioning and graft incorporation in angled bony-increased offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) assisted by navigated AR. Methods Fifteen shoulders with severe glenoid erosion underwent angled BIO-RSA between 2021 and 2023. Preoperative computed tomographic (CT) scans facilitated three-dimensional (3D) surgical planning. Intraoperatively, glenoid placement was guided by navigated AR. Postoperative CT scans at six months were analyzed for graft incorporation and compared with preoperative planning to assess implant positioning accuracy. Results The mean deviation between preoperative planning and postoperative positioning was 4.1° ± 3.4° (range, 0°–11°) in baseplate version and 1.9° ± 2.4° (range, 0°–9°) in inclination. Baseplate entry-point deviation was 1.6 mm ± 1.2 mm (range, 0.5–4.0 mm) in the antero-posterior direction and 1.1 mm ± 1.1 mm (range, 0–4.5 mm) in the superior-inferior direction. The mean deviation in baseplate offset reconstruction was 2.1 mm ± 1.6 mm (range, 0–5.5 mm). Complete graft incorporation was observed in all cases. Conclusion Navigated AR enhances precision in BIO-RSA, ensuring accurate correction of glenoid wear and adherence to preoperative 3D planning. Level of evidence Retrospective radiological study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Segers et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a13571ed1d949a99abf4b3https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732261423892
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper