Let ℱ be a finite family of graphs. In the ℱ-Deletion problem, one is given a graph G and an integer k, and the goal is to find k vertices whose deletion results in a graph with no minor from the family ℱ. This may be regarded as a far-reaching generalization of Vertex Cover and Feedback vertex Set. In their seminal work, Fomin, Lokshtanov, Misra & Saurabh FOCS 2012 gave a polynomial kernel for this problem when the family ℱ contains a planar graph. As the size of their kernel is g (ℱ) ⋅ k^f (ℱ), a natural follow-up question was whether the dependence on ℱ in the exponent of k can be avoided. The answer turned out to be negative: Giannopoulou, Jansen, Lokshtanov & Saurabh TALG 2017 proved that this is already inevitable for the special case of the Treewidth-η-Deletion problem. In this work, we show that this non-uniformity can be avoided at the expense of a small loss. First, we present a simple 2-approximate kernelization algorithm for Treewidth-η-Deletion with a kernel size g (η) ⋅ k⁶. Next, we show that the approximation factor can be made arbitrarily close to 1, if we settle for a kernelization protocol with 𝒪 (1) calls to an oracle that solves instances of size bounded by a uniform polynomial in k. We extend the above results to general ℱ-Deletion, whenever ℱ contains a planar graph, as long as an oracle for Treewidth-η-Deletion is available for small instances. Notably, all our constants are computable functions of ℱ and our techniques work also when some graphs in ℱ may be disconnected. Our results rely on two novel techniques. First, we transform so-called "near-protrusion decompositions" into true protrusion decompositions by sacrificing a small accuracy loss. Secondly, we show how to optimally compress such a decomposition with respect to general ℱ-Deletion. Using our second technique, we also obtain linear kernels on sparse graph classes when ℱ contains a planar graph, whereas the previously known theorems required all graphs in ℱ to be connected. Specifically, we generalize the kernelization algorithm by Kim, Langer, Paul, Reidl, Rossmanith, Sau & Sikdar TALG 2015 on graph classes that exclude a topological minor.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Roohani Sharma
National Dairy Research Institute
Michał Włodarczyk
Warsaw University of Technology
University of Warsaw
Institute for Basic Science
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sharma et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a135ebed1d949a99abfdd6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.4230/lipics.stacs.2026.78
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: