Music intervention significantly increased heart rate variability by raising HFnu by 7.05 units and reducing LFnu by 4.94 units compared to controls in 1295 participants.
Systematic Review (n=1,295)
Yes
Does music intervention improve heart rate variability parameters compared to control in diverse patient populations?
24 RCTs pooling 1,295 participants (653 in music intervention group, 642 in control group) from 13 countries, including diverse populations such as patients with stress/anxiety/fear/sleep disorders, organic diseases, healthy cohorts, and preterm infants.
Music intervention (including standardized music stimuli, participant-selected music, and live or special-format music stimuli) with durations ranging from 15 minutes to 3 months.
Control groups (mostly unblinded, standard care or non-music conditions).
Changes in heart rate variability (HRV) parameters (specifically high-frequency power in normalized units [HFnu] and low-frequency power in normalized units [LFnu]) after music intervention or control compared to baseline within each group.surrogate
Music intervention significantly improves heart rate variability by shifting autonomic balance toward parasympathetic dominance, particularly in patients with emotional or sleep disorders.
Effect estimate: MD 7.05 for HFnu increase, MD -4.94 for LFnu decrease (95% CI 95% CI for HFnu 1.00 to 13.10, for LFnu -9.13 to -0.76)
p-value: p=0.02 for both HFnu increase and LFnu decrease
Objective To evaluate the effects of music intervention on heart rate variability (HRV). Methods The protocol of this systematic review has been submitted for registration in the PROSPERO databa se, an international prospective register for sys tematic reviews, with ID number CRD420261283257. Data sources included electronic databases searched from inception through January 2026. Randomized clinical trials comparing music intervention with control were included. The primary outcomes were changes in HRV parameters after music intervention or control compared to baseline within each group. Mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for continuous variables. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed according to the Cochrane Handbook. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger’s regression test. Results A total of 24 randomized controlled trials involving 1,295 participants were analyzed. The meta-analysis demonstrated that music intervention significantly increased high-frequency power in normalized units (HFnu) compared to control groups (MD = 7.05, 95% CI: 1.00–13.10, p = 0.02), while significantly decreasing low-frequency power in normalized units (LFnu) (MD = −4.94, 95% CI: −9.13 to −0.76, p = 0.02). Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with stress/anxiety/fear/sleep disorders showed the most substantial improvements across multiple HRV parameters. Short-term interventions (≤30 min) were particularly effective for enhancing HFnu, and participant-selected music yielded superior outcomes compared to standardized music. The overall evidence quality was rated as moderate for the primary outcomes. Conclusion Music intervention significantly improved LFnu and HFnu compared to control groups. People with emotional disorders can improve their HRV through music intervention. Systematic review registration PROSPERO, Identifier: CRD420261283257.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Enyuan Zhang
Xiaoyan Wu
Jing Xu
Frontiers in Psychology
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Tianjin Medical University
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
Heart Rhythm Society
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhang et al. (Wed,) conducted a systematic review in Various including stress, anxiety, fear, sleep disorders, organic diseases, healthy cohorts, preterm infants (n=1,295). Music intervention vs. Control group with no music intervention or alternative condition was evaluated on Change in heart rate variability (HRV) parameters including high-frequency power normalized units (HFnu) and low-frequency power normalized units (LFnu) after music intervention compared to control (MD 7.05 for HFnu increase, MD -4.94 for LFnu decrease, 95% CI 95% CI for HFnu 1.00 to 13.10, for LFnu -9.13 to -0.76, p=0.02 for both HFnu increase and LFnu decrease). Music intervention significantly increased heart rate variability by raising HFnu by 7.05 units and reducing LFnu by 4.94 units compared to controls in 1295 participants.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a285aa0a974eb0d3c00a55 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1750786