Geometric deep learning estimated coronary wall shear stress in under 5s with 0.48 Pa error, matching CFD's predictive accuracy for myocardial infarction (R=0.89).
Does a geometric deep learning framework (GEM-GCN) accurately estimate coronary wall shear stress and predict myocardial infarction compared to computational fluid dynamics in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
748 patients (1078 coronary arteries) undergoing invasive coronary angiography
Geometric deep learning framework based on gauge-equivariant mesh graph convolutional network (GEM-GCN) for coronary wall shear stress (WSS) estimation
Time-averaged WSS computed by transient computational fluid dynamics (CFD)
Accuracy of WSS estimation (absolute error, percentage error, Dice distance) and myocardial infarction (MI) prediction performancesurrogate
Geometric deep learning enables rapid, CFD-free estimation of coronary wall shear stress from routine angiography with comparable prognostic value for myocardial infarction.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Coronary wall shear stress (WSS) derived from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) provides mechanistic insight and prognostic information, but its clinical translation is hindered by modeling complexity and computation time. We evaluated a geometric deep learning framework based on gauge-equivariant mesh graph convolutional network (GEM-GCN) to estimate coronary WSS directly in geometries reconstructed from coronary angiography in real-world patients. A total of 1078 coronary arteries from 748 patients were reconstructed from invasive angiography. Time-averaged WSS computed by transient CFD served as reference labels for GEM-GCN training and testing. Two experiments were conducted: (i) random splitting of the full dataset with 10-fold cross-validation, and (ii) a clinical split , to assess whether GEM-GCN–derived WSS preserved the ability to predict myocardial infarction (MI) compared with CFD-derived WSS. GEM-GCN produced patient-specific WSS maps in < 5s per vessel. GEM-GCN slightly underestimated lesion- and vessel-averaged WSS in the random split, with absolute and percentage errors equal to 0.48 0.26–0.78 Pa and 23.6 14.8–42.6%, respectively. High spatial agreement was found for high-WSS regions (Dice distance 0.88 0.81–0.92). Similar performance was observed in the clinical split (absolute error 0.65 0.41–1.12 Pa; Dice distance 0.84 0.71–0.90). After normalization by vessel-averaged WSS, the correlation between GEM-GCN-derived and CFD lesion-averaged WSS improved from R = 0.67 to R = 0.89 (p < 0.0001). Lesion-averaged WSS and the lesion-to-vessel WSS ratio achieved comparable MI prediction performance for CFD and GEM-GCN. Geometric deep learning enables fast, CFD-free coronary WSS estimation from routine angiography, supporting its potential for large-scale, real-world risk stratification. • Coronary wall shear stress (WSS) is estimated in real-time in real-world vessels. • Geometric deep learning (GDL) identified vessel regions exposed to high WSS. • GDL-based WSS predictive capacity for myocardial infarction is comparable to CFD. • GDL performance promises WSS clinical translation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bianca Griffo
Polytechnic University of Turin
Diego Gallo
David Marlevi
Karolinska Institutet
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Karolinska Institutet
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Griffo et al. (Wed,) reported a other. Geometric deep learning estimated coronary wall shear stress in under 5s with 0.48 Pa error, matching CFD's predictive accuracy for myocardial infarction (R=0.89).
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286240a974eb0d3c00efe — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2026.111583