The Endocrine Society guideline identified diastolic blood pressure abnormalities in 15.2% of 16-year-old males versus 8.1% by the American Academy of Pediatrics guideline, indicating greater sensitivity of ES criteria.
Observational (n=1,035)
Yes
Does the Endocrine Society guideline improve the detection of blood pressure abnormalities compared to the American Academy of Pediatrics guideline in Korean adolescents?
1,035 Korean adolescents aged 13–17 years drawn from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2014–2016)
Assessment of blood pressure abnormalities and metabolic syndrome using the Endocrine Society (ES) guidelines
Assessment of blood pressure abnormalities and metabolic syndrome using the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines
Prevalence of blood pressure abnormalities (hypertensive status, systolic, and diastolic) and metabolic syndromesurrogate
The Endocrine Society guidelines are more sensitive than the AAP guidelines for detecting diastolic blood pressure abnormalities in adolescents, supporting their use for early cardiometabolic screening.
Effect estimate: Difference in detection rate
Absolute Event Rate: 15.2% vs 8.1%
p-value: p=<0.05
Purpose: Pediatric hypertension and metabolic syndrome (MS) are increasing in parallel with childhood obesity. Variations in diagnostic thresholds between the Endocrine Society (ES) and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines may affect detection and intervention timing.Methods: We analyzed data from 1,035 Korean adolescents aged 13–17 years drawn from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2014–2016). Blood pressure (BP) abnormalities and MS were assessed according to ES and AAP guidelines. Differences by sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) category were examined.Results: The ES guidelines identified significantly more cases of diastolic BP (DBP) abnormalities than the AAP guidelines. For example, ES identified DBP abnormalities in 15.2% in 16-year-old males versus 8.1% identified by AAP. This difference was especially prominent for prehypertensive categories. ES percentile-based thresholds were more sensitive to subtle diastolic elevations, while AAP uses fixed cutoffs that may underestimate early risk. MS prevalence exceeded 30% in multiple age groups among adolescents with BMI≥85th percentile. However, MS prevalence did not significantly differ between the 2 guidelines in any age or sex subgroup.Conclusion: Awareness of hypertensive status is essential in the era of increasing childhood and adolescent obesity. The ES guidelines might be more suitable for cardiometabolic screening in Korean adolescents than the AAP guidelines because they effectively detect hypertensive status, including DBP abnormalities.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
In-Hyuk Chung
National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital
Yong Hee Hong
Sochung Chung
Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism
Soonchunhyang University
Konkuk University Medical Center
National Health Insurance Service
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chung et al. (Thu,) conducted a observational in Korean adolescents aged 13-17 years with or without elevated blood pressure or metabolic syndrome (n=1,035). Endocrine Society blood pressure guideline criteria vs. American Academy of Pediatrics blood pressure guideline criteria was evaluated on Prevalence of diastolic blood pressure abnormalities (prehypertension/elevated BP) (Difference in detection rate, p=<0.05). The Endocrine Society guideline identified diastolic blood pressure abnormalities in 15.2% of 16-year-old males versus 8.1% by the American Academy of Pediatrics guideline, indicating greater sensitivity of ES criteria.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286eb0a974eb0d3c024aa — DOI: https://doi.org/10.6065/apem.2550224.112