Abstract Fentanyl is associated with significant respiratory, cardiovascular, and neurological adverse events (AEs). This study aimed to describe the safety of fentanyl administered through different routes of administration, with a focus on brain lesions. Safety data related to fentanyl were extracted from the EudraVigilance database up to March 7, 2024. Descriptive and disproportionality analyses were performed. A total of 6,441 cases were classifiable for the administration route. The transdermal route (80.9%) was the most reported route. Most cases were from adults and females. Overall, 92.8% of AEs were serious. The intravenous route had a higher disproportionate reporting of “nervous system disorders” than transdermal (ROR 1.31; 95% CI, 1.12–1.41) and oral transmucosal (1.30; 1.12–1.49). Among central nervous system disorders, 50 brain lesions were identified, with no statistically significant difference observed. Nasal administration had a higher reporting frequency of “central nervous system vascular disorders” compared to transdermal (2.45; 1.14–5.24), intravenous (2.53; 1.09–5.87), and oral transmucosal routes (4.89; 1.54–15.51). On the other hand, the intravenous had a higher disproportionate reporting of “seizures” compared to nasal (3.19; 1.17–8.69), oral transmucosal (2.09; 1.31–3.32), and transdermal routes (2.41; 1.96–2.96). The study provides a comprehensive safety profile of fentanyl across different administration routes, highlighting a higher disproportionate reporting of central neurologic and cardiovascular AEs with nasal and intravenous routes.
Napoli et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: