PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 20260 citationsOpen Access

GovernanceControl

View Full Paper
BSBin Seol

Key Points

  • This work aims to formalize a control mechanism for adaptive multi-agent systems to enhance stability and self-correction.
  • Defined a governance state vector
  • Constructed a multi-resolution state estimator
  • Derived threshold-based intervention control laws
  • Validated findings through simulation and analysis
  • Identified the Dependency Trap mechanism impacting self-correction capacity
  • Quantitatively validated critical threshold with SCC* = d/β_r
  • Showed excessive intervention leads to 150+ collapses post-withdrawal
  • Demonstrated maturation-aware control outperforms time-based decay under disturbance

Abstract

This paper formalizes the operational control layer of the Deficit-Fractal Governance (DFG) framework for adaptive multi-agent systems operating near criticality. We define a governance state vector, construct a multi-resolution state estimator, and derive threshold-based intervention control laws under a minimum-intervention principle: the controller is designed to reduce its own activity over time. A central contribution is the Dependency Trap mechanism, in which well-intentioned intervention structurally degrades self-correction capacity, producing post-withdrawal fragility invisible to standard health metrics. A minimal dynamical model confirms the mechanism quantitatively: the analytically derived critical threshold SCC* = d/βᵣ is validated by simulation, and systems trained under excessive intervention produce 150+ collapses after governance withdrawal compared to zero under minimal intervention. Version 2. 0 introduces maturation-aware control by coupling intervention dynamics to closure depth Lc (t) from the companion Dynamic Closure theory. A regression shock experiment demonstrates that this coupling is qualitatively distinct from time-based decay: under transient perturbation, maturation-aware governance provides automatic state-contingent re-engagement (p < 0. 000001 vs. monotonic withdrawal), a capability no time-scheduled policy can replicate.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bin Seol (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a287570a974eb0d3c0301bhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18779143
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Intervention Paradox: Why Direct Governance Near Criticality Fails — A Coarse-Grained Potential Theory2026
  2. 2The Dynamics of Governability: Decision Load, Feedback Latency, and the Limits of Continuous Control2026
  3. 3DFG_Dynamic_Closure2026
  4. 4Deficit-Fractal Governance as a Finite-Scale Spectral Field Theory2026
  5. 5Pre-Stabilisation Signals in Complex Systems: An Empirical Protocol for Testing Governance Sufficiency and an Invitation to the Research Community2026