PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Turkish Journal of Archaeological Sciences0 citations

Digitalising Materialities: Integrating 3D Documentation at Tall Ya'moun and Tall al-Assara

MLMarta LorenzónPGPaula GheorghiadeSRSamuel Reinikainen

Key Points

  • The study aims to compare two methods for creating 3D models of archaeological objects in Jordan.
  • Used mobile LiDAR-based scanning with an iPad Pro and Polycam application.
  • Applied traditional DSLR-based photogrammetry with professional software.
  • Evaluated workflow performance focusing on data acquisition, processing, visual quality, and accessibility.
  • Photogrammetry offers higher geometric resolution and image quality for detailed analysis.
  • LiDAR scanning with iPad is faster, more user-friendly, and portable.
  • Mobile scanning is effective for rapid documentation and outreach without needing precise accuracy.

Abstract

The increasing accessibility of 3D modelling technologies has significantly expanded digital documentation practices in archaeology, ranging from consumer-grade applications to professional photogrammetric workflows. This paper presents a comparative methodological case study based on archaeological material from Tall Ya’moun and Tall al-Assara in northern Jordan. It outlines and evaluates two approaches for producing 3D models of small- to medium-sized cultural heritage objects: (1) mobile LiDAR-based scanning with an iPad Pro using the Polycam application; and (2) traditional DSLR-based photogrammetry using professional software. The comparison focuses on workflow performance, including data acquisition, processing requirements, visual quality, and accessibility, rather than providing an independent metric accuracy assessment. The findings show that although photogrammetry has higher geometric resolution and image quality suitable for detailed analysis, the iPad/LiDAR system has great advantages in terms of speed, usability, and portability. Such attributes make mobile scanning ideal for rapid documentation, visualization, and outreach purposes where sub-millimetric accuracy is not necessary.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lorenzón et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a287e20a974eb0d3c03ad3https://doi.org/10.63167/tjas.2026.8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Quality Assessment of Digital 3D Models of Museum Artefacts from the Mobile LiDAR iPhone and Structured Light Scanners2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2A Scale-constrained Multi-source Photogrammetric Survey for Archaeological Documentation: Methodological Choices, Accuracy Assessment, and Critical Evaluation2026
  3. 3When Reality Meets Practice: Challenges and Pitfalls in 3D Digitization Using Structured Light Scanning and Photogrammetry in Cultural Heritage2026 · 4 citations
  4. 4Evaluating iPhone-Based 3D Scanning Applications for Heritage Documentation: Controlled Experiments and Future Directions2026
  5. 5Digitizing Challenging Heritage Sites with the Use of iPhone LiDAR and Photogrammetry: The Case-Study of Sourp Magar Monastery in Cyprus2025 · 8 citations