PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Fractal and Fractional0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Study on Pore Characteristics and Methane Adsorption Capacity of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Shales with Different Lithofacies

View Full Paper
XZXiaoming ZhangCHChangcheng HanLCLanpu Chen

Key Points

  • The central aim is to evaluate pore characteristics and methane adsorption capacities across different shale lithofacies from the Longmaxi Formation.
  • Analyzed shale samples from the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation.
  • Conducted total organic carbon (TOC) content analysis.
  • Employed X-ray diffraction (XRD) and field emission–scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM).
  • Performed gas adsorption tests including low-pressure CO2/N2 and high-pressure methane adsorption.
  • Classified shales into three lithofacies based on TOC and mineral composition.
  • Organic-rich (OR) shales exhibited maximum TOC content and methane adsorption capacity.
  • OL shales had the lowest TOC and the poorest methane adsorption performance.
  • OR shales demonstrated the highest pore surface area and volume, indicating superior gas storage potential.
  • Mirrored pore characteristics suggest a strong relationship between TOC and methane adsorption efficiency.

Abstract

In this study, shale samples with diverse lithofacies from the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Fuling Field were investigated to evaluate the variations in pore characteristics and methane adsorption capacity (MAC) of different shale lithofacies. A set of experiments were performed, such as total organic carbon (TOC) content, X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission–scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), low-pressure gas (CO2/N2) adsorption, and high-pressure methane adsorption. Combined with TOC content and mineral composition, three types of shale lithofacies were identified, including organic-rich (OR) argillaceous-rich siliceous (S-3) shale lithofacies, organic-moderate (OM) argillaceous/siliceous mixed (M-2) shale lithofacies, and organic-lean (OL) siliceous-rich argillaceous (CM-1) shale lithofacies. Through detailed comparative analyses, we found that OR S-3 shales possess the maximum TOC content, the most developed heterogeneous organic micro-mesopores, the largest pore volume (PV), and the highest pore surface area (PSA); consequently, they display the strongest MAC. Conversely, OL CM-1 shales have the lowest TOC content and the highest clay content, and thus the smallest PSA and the poorest methane adsorption performance. In conclusion, considering the excellent gas storage potential, sustained shale gas production, and brittle response to hydraulic fracturing, OR S-3 shales are superior to shale gas exploration and exploitation compared with OM M-2 and OL CM-1 shales.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a287e20a974eb0d3c03c47https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract10030154
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper