PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Small Group Research0 citations

Development and Validation of Three Scales Measuring Interdisciplinary Research Team Participants’ Experiences

View Full Paper
XMXiao MengPGPatricia GoodsonWWWei Wang

Key Points

  • The aim is to create and validate scales to evaluate interdisciplinary research team participants' experiences.
  • Developed three scales: IDR Gains, PI Perceptions of Challenges, and Non-PI Perceptions of PIs
  • Conducted psychometric testing with university faculty from diverse disciplines
  • Applied confirmatory factor analysis to assess model fit and reliability
  • Achieved a good model fit for the scales
  • All scales demonstrated high reliability with coefficients greater than 0.9
  • Validated the scales' convergent validity

Abstract

Evaluating interdisciplinary research (IDR) teams is essential for improving productivity and outcomes. To contribute to the growing toolkit for evaluating IDR teamwork, we created three scales: IDR Gains, Principal Investigator (PI) Perceptions of Challenges, and Non-PI Perceptions of PIs—designed for use in academic settings. The scales were psychometrically tested with university faculty from various disciplines ( n = 345) who were invited to apply for interdisciplinary seed-grants. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed good model fit, and all scales demonstrated high reliability (α ≥ .9) and convergent validity. These instruments offer valuable tools for assessing and enhancing researchers’ experiences with IDR, particularly in colleges/universities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Meng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a288590a974eb0d3c0435bhttps://doi.org/10.1177/10464964251404492
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper