PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2026Applied Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Monocular Camera Localization in Known Environments: An In-Depth Review

View Full Paper
HYHailun YanALAlbert LauHFHongchao Fan

Key Points

  • This review aims to analyze monocular camera localization techniques in defined environments, focusing on accuracy and methodological advancements.
  • Categorized localization approaches into 2D-2D matching, 2D-3D matching, and regression methods.
  • Conducted performance comparisons using mainstream datasets.
  • Highlighted foundational techniques and recent developments.
  • 2D-3D methods typically provide the highest accuracy in structured outdoor environments.
  • Scene coordinate regression techniques like ACE achieve competitive performance in indoor settings.
  • Identified challenges include improving generalization and reducing retraining needs.

Abstract

Monocular camera localization in known environments is a critical task for applications like autonomous navigation, augmented reality, and robotic positioning, requiring precise spatial awareness. Unlike localization in unknown environments, which builds maps in real time, this leverages pre-existing data for higher accuracy. This review comprehensively analyzes monocular camera localization methods in known environments, categorizing them into 2D-2D feature matching, 2D-3D feature matching, and regression-based approaches. It consolidates foundational techniques and recent advancements, providing inter-class and intra-class performance comparisons on mainstream datasets. Key findings show that 2D-3D methods generally offer the highest accuracy, especially in structured outdoor environments, due to robust use of 3D spatial information. However, recent scene coordinate regression methods, such as ACE and ACE++, achieve comparable or superior performance in indoor scenes with more efficient pipelines. This review highlights challenges and proposes future directions: (1) synthetic data generation to meet deep learning demands, while addressing domain gaps; (2) improving generalization to unseen scenes and reducing retraining; (3) multi-sensor fusion for enhanced robustness; (4) exploring transformer-based and graph neural network architectures; (5) developing lightweight models for real-time performance on resource-constrained devices. This review aims to guide researchers and practitioners in method selection and identify key research directions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a3d811ec16d51705d2e958https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052332
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1NeuroLoc: Encoding Navigation Cells for 6-DOF Camera Localization2025
  2. 2Mobile Robot Localization and SLAM: A Critical Review of Sensors, Multi-Sensor Fusion, and Neural Representations2026
  3. 3Real‐Time Monocular 2D Occupancy Grid Mapping for Autonomous Navigation of Ground Robots2025
  4. 4Accurate Prior-centric Monocular Positioning with Offline LiDAR Fusion2024
  5. 5Enhancing Autonomous Navigation: A Visual SLAM Approach2024 · 1 citations