PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Is There a Sea of Free Electrons in Metals?

View Full Paper
ZLZitao LiuWenzhou Medical University

Key Points

  • To challenge traditional theories of superconductivity by proposing an alternative model based on electron tunnels.
  • Evaluated the role of free-moving electrons in metals and their impact on resistivity.
  • Introduced the concept of isopotential electron tunnels formed between molecules.
  • Analyzed the effects of pressure on resistivity and superconductivity.
  • Described how electron confinement within molecular orbitals challenges the free electron model.
  • Proposed that reducing molecular spacing can enhance conductivity and achieve zero resistance.
  • Linked electron tunneling to key superconducting phenomena like the Meissner effect.

Abstract

Challenges regarding the widely accepted BCS superconductivity theory may arise from misconceptions about the sea of free-moving electrons and metallic bonds. Based on these concepts, electrical resistance is assumed to be caused by electron vibrations and collisions in conductors. Implicitly granted by this model, the BCS theory suggests that coupled electrons in Cooper pairs can minimize their vibrations and resistance, leading to the phenomenon of superconductivity. However, if delocalized electrons were responsible for holding molecules together in metallic bonds, how could metal structures remain stable when electrons move in a current? The primary challenge to these models is the negative impact of pressure on resistivity and superconductivity. Abandoning these models, an alternative theory introduces the concept of isopotential electron tunnels within conductors. Formed between closely spaced molecules, these tunnels allow electrons to move across molecules at the same energy level, resulting in currents. Electrons in conductors, rather than being free-moving, are typically confined to orbitals within their respective molecules, below the energy level of these conducting tunnels. Raising electrons into the tunnels requires energy, which manifests as electrical resistance. The resistance of a conductor can be reduced by compressing the molecular spacing, which minimizes the gap between the tunnels and valence orbitals. This gap can be further reduced to zero with additional pressure, resulting in the tunnels overlapping with valence orbitals. Consequently, electrons reside naturally within the tunnels without a need for the lifting energy to the tunnels, resulting in zero resistance—superconductivity. This theory comprehensively explains observed superconducting phenomena, including the Meissner effect, critical current density, critical magnetic field, the inverse relationship between resistivity and pressure, and why many high-temperature superconductors are achieved under high pressures. According to this theory, compressing molecular distances is the key to synthesizing room-temperature superconductors. An optimal approach involves engineering molecular structures to leverage attraction between specific molecules, thereby minimizing the gap.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zitao Liu (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a3d8d8ec16d51705d30031https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18808367
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper