Acute stridor is frequently equated with croup in pediatric contexts; however, other conditions, such as anaphylaxis, may present with remarkably similar clinical and radiographic characteristics. This article presents two pediatric cases of acute stridor initially managed as croup but ultimately diagnosed and treated as anaphylaxis induced by seafood ingestion. Both patients experienced recovery following the administration of intramuscular adrenaline. These cases underscore the necessity for increased vigilance and comprehensive history-taking when evaluating pediatric acute stridor. Identifying allergic triggers and administering timely treatment can be lifesaving.
Nagarajan et al. (Sat,) studied this question.