Individualizing muscle strengthening is central to sports rehabilitation, yet clinicians often rely on isolated metrics such as peak torque or limb symmetry. These measures are informative but do not describe how force is expressed across contraction velocities, which is a key determinant of power production and high-velocity functional capacity. Force–velocity profiling provides a practical reasoning framework to classify deficits as force-oriented or velocity-oriented and to tailor exercise selection and loading accordingly. When high-velocity or high-power functional tasks are not yet feasible, torque data collected at multiple angular velocities using isokinetic dynamometry can provide a controlled basis for early assessment of muscle performance, provided these data are interpreted within a clinical reasoning framework. In this context, isokinetic force–velocity capacities do not replace functional testing; rather, their clinical interpretation can help plan and justify progression toward higher-velocity and more sport-specific exposures. The clinical value lies less in utilization of technology than in the interpretive lens of the testing results that links assessment to prescription. From an international perspective, this framework is adaptable across diverse practice settings and may improve coherence between assessment, strengthening prescription, and functional progression after injury.
Moiroux-Sahraoui et al. (Sat,) studied this question.