Automated analysis of liquid-based cervical cytology is increasingly supported by digital microscopy and deep learning. However, model generalization remains challenging due to scanner- and laboratory-induced domain shifts affecting color, texture, and morphology. In this study, we present a robust cell-level classification framework for liquid-based Pap smear cytology based on deep transfer learning, designed to operate under heterogeneous acquisition conditions. We construct a multi-source dataset by integrating three widely used public reference repositories (SIPaKMeD, Herlev, CRIC Cervix) with a proprietary cohort comprising 416 Whole Slide Images (WSIs) collected from two medical centers and digitized using different scanning systems. All labels are harmonized into four Bethesda categories (NILM, ASC-US, LSIL, HSIL), and cell-centered 224 × 224 patches are used as standardized inputs for model development and benchmarking. We evaluate state-of-the-art CNN backbones (ResNet50, EfficientNetB0, VGG16) and perform systematic ablation across data-source combinations to quantify robustness under acquisition variability. Among the evaluated models, ResNet50 yields the best overall performance on the independent test set (accuracy = 0.91; macro-F1 = 0.91), consistently outperforming EfficientNetB0 and VGG16. Importantly, incorporating proprietary multi-center WSI-derived data improves robustness to scanner-induced variation compared to training on public data alone. These findings demonstrate that combining diverse data sources can mitigate domain shift in cell-level cervical cytology classification. While clinically actionable screening requires slide-level aggregation (e.g., MIL-based WSI inference), the proposed classifier provides a robust component that can be integrated into end-to-end WSI screening pipelines in future work.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gulfize Coskun
Mustafa Caner Akuner
Erkan Kaplanoğlu
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Coskun et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a67ec3f353c071a6f0a3dc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13030289