PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing0 citationsOpen Access

Machine Learning for In Situ Quality Assessment and Defect Diagnosis in Refill Friction Stir Spot Welding

JAJordan AndersenTSTaylor SmithJJJared Jackson

Key Points

  • Success in predicting defect presence with 96% accuracy highlights the effectiveness of machine learning methods.
  • Key predictors, including minimum spindle torque, were identified, emphasizing their role in defect formation.
  • Thirty adverse treatments created 300 potentially defective welds, evaluated through advanced techniques like computed tomography.
  • A proposed framework aims to integrate machine learning models into manufacturing for low-cost quality assessments.

Abstract

Refill Friction Stir Spot Welding (RFSSW) provides significant advantages over competing spot joining technologies, but detecting RFSSW’s often small and subtle defects remains challenging. In this study, kinematic feedback data from a RFSSW machine’s factory-installed sensors was used to successfully predict defect presence with 96% accuracy (F1 = 0.92) and preliminary multi-class defect diagnosis with 84% accuracy (F1 = 0.82). Thirty adverse treatments (e.g., contaminated coupons, worn tools, and incorrect material thickness) were carried out to create 300 potentially defective welds, plus control welds, which were then evaluated using profilometry, computed tomography (CT) scanning, cutting and polishing, and tensile testing. Various machine learning (ML) models were trained and compared on statistical features, with support vector machine (SVM) achieving top performance on final quality prediction (binary), random forest outperforming other models in classifying welds into six diagnosis categories (plus a control category) based on the adverse treatments. Key predictors linking process signals to defect formation were identified, such as minimum spindle torque during the plunge phase. In conclusion a framework is proposed to integrate these models into a manufacturing setting for low-cost, full-coverage evaluation of RFSSWs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Andersen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75a83c6e9836116a206a5https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp10020044
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper