Large earthquakes often occur unexpectedly, mostly in previously recognized high seismic hazard regions. Some of them are forewarned by small and moderate magnitude events classified as “foreshocks” once the major one happens. However, most seismic clusters do not lead to large mainshocks. The real time discrimination between them would be an outstanding achievement in short-term seismic forecasting. Here, we analyze small and large mainshock clusters until the occurrence of the event with the largest magnitude in Italy from 1990 to 2024. Our results suggest that seismicity spreads over larger areas, is featured by higher magnitude variance and entropy, and it tends to grow both in number and cumulative seismic moment as the magnitude of the impending mainshock increases. We propose a possible explanation considering progressive destabilization of crustal volumes marked by some characteristics of seismic clusters. Our investigation provides a first attempt to assess the probability that an ongoing seismic cluster is likely to culminate with a large mainshock or to wane in a swarm, grounded on the statistical properties of observed seismicity.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Davide Zaccagnino
Carlo Doglioni
Natural Hazards
Sapienza University of Rome
Southern University of Science and Technology
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zaccagnino et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75bb9c6e9836116a23930 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07830-y