Urban rail transit systems frequently encounter challenges related to service reliability and passenger crowding, particularly during peak operational hours and in networks with complex service patterns. This paper presents an innovative approach to real-time train holding that addresses the unique challenges posed by systems with scheduled short-turning, where passenger loads at short-turning points can vary significantly. We developed a dual-strategy framework that combines (1) a real-time heuristic that calculates holding times using both historical data and real-time information to minimize passenger-experienced crowding, and (2) a predictive modeling approach that anticipates headway situations when full-length service trains from the terminal arrive at short-turning stations. Unlike conventional headway-equalizing strategies that overlook load variations in high-demand scenarios operating near capacity, our approach explicitly accounts for heterogeneous passenger loads across different service types to reduce denied boarding and passenger wait times. The effectiveness of our framework was evaluated using a microscopic simulation model of a high-frequency, high-demand urban rail transit system. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach reduced denied boarding incidents by 30% through improved train load balancing. The combination of predictive control with downstream holding strategies improved service quality through the proactive regulation of train dispatching at terminals, coupled with adjustments at key stations.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mojtaba Yousefi
Muhammad Usama
Haris N. Koutsopoulos
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Northeastern University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yousefi et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75bdfc6e9836116a23fbc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981251414099
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: