The smartphone-based CUVAF imaging tool demonstrates strong agreement with the gold-standard DSLR system, supporting its potential for clinical and field-based assessment of ocular UV exposure. Slight differences in measured CUVAF area are likely attributable to inherent differences in optical geometry and magnification between the two devices, not underlying biological variation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Priya Bahra
Lea Damnjanovic
Koko Faen
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
UNSW Sydney
University of Technology Sydney
Prince of Wales Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bahra et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75cd7c6e9836116a260b5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-026-03992-3