Argument mining is a subfield of argumentation that aims to automatically extract argumentative structures and their relations from natural language texts. This article investigates how a single large language model can be leveraged to perform one or several argument mining tasks. Our contributions are two-fold. First, we construct a multi-task dataset by surveying and converting 19 well-known argument mining datasets from the literature into a unified format. Second, we explore various training strategies using Meta AI’s Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct model: (1) fine-tuning on individual tasks, (2) fine-tuning jointly on multiple tasks, and (3) merging models fine-tuned separately on individual tasks. Our experiments show that task-specific fine-tuning significantly improves individual performance across all tasks. Moreover, multi-task fine-tuning maintains strong performance without degradation, suggesting effective transfer learning across related tasks. Finally, we demonstrate that model merging offers a viable compromise: it yields competitive performance while mitigating the computational costs associated with full multi-task fine-tuning.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Henri Savigny
Bruno Yun
Argument & Computation
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1
Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Savigny et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75cf0c6e9836116a263e2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19462174251413169