In 1935, Boots the Chemists, the United Kingdom's leading retail pharmacy chain, acquired two premises in New Zealand – one in Wellington and the other in Auckland. This marked the company's first overseas retail venture and was envisaged as the starting point for a wider expansion across the British Empire. Yet far from being welcomed, Boots encountered an onslaught of organised opposition. New Zealand pharmacists, supported by growing professional bodies, such as the Pharmaceutical Society of New Zealand and the Chemists' Service Guild, portrayed the company as a threat to local communities, national health, and the country's right to self-determination. Their campaign attracted international attention, with transnational expressions of solidarity and financial contributions reinforcing local resistance. While Boots' chairman, John Boot, invoked a rhetoric of benevolent imperialism to justify the firm's entry into New Zealand, the intensity of pharmacists' opposition prompted government intervention and ultimately helped introduce legislative changes to New Zealand pharmacy in support of the independent chemist. Concerns about Boots' retail expansion were not simply a reaction to an evolving imperial relationship to Britain, but were entangled with wider anxieties about Americanisation, particularly the perceived threat of large chain stores.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Anna Greenwood
RICHARD HORNSEY
Hilary Ingram
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Greenwood et al. (Thu,) studied this question.