Refractory multi-principal element alloys (RMPEAs) exhibit significant potential for applications in aerospace, nuclear energy, and petrochemical industries due to their outstanding high-temperature strength, wear resistance, radiation resistance, and thermal stability. However, achieving an optimal balance between strength and ductility through compositional design remains a critical challenge for this class of materials. In this study, a series Al 2.5 Nb 17.5 Ti 50 Zr 30- x V x ( x =0, 10, 20, 30 at.%) alloys were designed and fabricated using a combination of experimental techniques and first-principles calculations. The effects of vanadium (V) substitution for zirconium (Zr) on microstructural evolution, mechanical properties, and electronic structure were systematically studied to uncover the microscopic mechanisms by which V alters the strength-ductility balance through lattice distortion. Experimental results showed that all alloys maintained a single-phase BCC solid solution structure, with cold rolling at room temperature achieving more than 80% deformation. Appropriate V substitution for Zr modulated lattice distortion and solid solution strengthening, leading to an increase in yield strength from 633 MPa to 719 MPa, while maintaining excellent room-temperature ductility (fracture elongation > 20%). First-principles calculations confirmed that V substitution for Zr reduces lattice distortion and improves the elastic modulus of the alloys. The V-regulation strategy proposed in this work provides a theoretical foundation for the synergistic optimization of strength and ductility in RMPEAs.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kai Xiong
Kunchuan Wang
Yingwu Wang
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Yunnan University
Kunming University
Kunming Institute of Precious Metals
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xiong et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75feec6e9836116a2c502 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2026.01.215
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: