• Evaluated five U-Net variants for Sentinel-1 SAR-based burned area mapping. • U-Net++ performs best when combining log-ratio and vegetation indices (VIs). • Log-ratio fails in high-elevation areas if terrain is not properly flattened. • Temporal changes in soil moisture can cause false positives with VIs. • Log-ratio with VIs mitigates errors caused by elevation and soil moisture. Frequent and severe wildfires driven by climate change intensify the need for accurate burned area (BA) mapping, which can be effectively addressed using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) due to its cloud-penetration capability and sensitivity to vegetation and moisture changes. However, BA mapping based on SAR-only approaches relies on U-Net with ResNet50 backbone or fully convolutional neural network, while the potential of advanced architectural components remains underexplored. Moreover, prior research primarily emphasizes log-ratio features, with limited focus on standalone capacity of dual polarized vegetation indices (VIs). This study addresses these gaps by evaluating the performance of five U-Net variants (U-Net, Attention U-Net, Residual Attention U-Net, U-Net++, and U-Net 3 +) using four input schemes: log-ratio, log-ratio without cross-ratio, VIs, and a combined feature set of all. Three combinations of loss function such as binary cross entropy (BCE), dice, and focal are also applied to the best model of all scheme. Experimental results show that U-Net++ with log-ratio inputs under BCE loss function achieves the highest performance, yielding an F1 score of 0.8218 and an Intersection of Union (IoU) of 0.6795. Further analysis reveals that VIs alone can effectively delineate burned areas (F1: 0.8244; IoU: 0.7013) with focal loss, and combining them with log-ratio features delivers the best performance (F1: 0.8364; IoU: 0.7188), when dice and focal loss functions are applied. Overall, this study offers a quantitative evaluation of how dual-polarized VIs and deep learning architectures affect SAR-based BA mapping performance and suggests promising directions for future enhancement through advanced feature extraction techniques.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rana et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7603cc6e9836116a2cc4a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2026.105141
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
S.M. Sohel Rana
Jaese Lee
Yoojin Kang
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology
Kookmin University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...