Heart disease remains a leading global cause of mortality, highlighting the urgent need for effective early diagnostic tools. This study introduces a robust, comparative machine learning framework for predicting heart disease based on a consolidated dataset comprising 918 patient records and 46 clinically relevant features. Ten well-established supervised learning algorithms—including Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Neural Network, AdaBoost, CN2 Rule Induction, k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Naive Bayes, and Decision Tree—were rigorously evaluated. The models were assessed using a suite of metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, area under the curve (AUC), and Matthew’s correlation coefficient (MCC), to ensure a comprehensive performance profile. Gradient Boosting achieved the highest predictive accuracy (87.4%) and AUC (0.928), outperforming all other models in identifying patterns within the clinical dataset. The methodology integrates both Python-based libraries and the Orange Data Mining tool to support low-code, reproducible workflows for healthcare practitioners and researchers. In addition to delivering high-performance classification, the study highlights model interpretability, feature relevance, and practical deployment using accessible platforms. These contributions underscore the potential of ensemble-based machine learning to enhance early detection and clinical decision-making in cardiovascular healthcare. This study distinguishes itself by integrating a low-code, clinician-friendly deployment pipeline using Orange Data Mining alongside Python, enabling real-time, interpretable risk assessment without requiring deep programming expertise. The framework emphasizes transparent feature relevance and multi-metric evaluation to support clinical decision-making.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mowafaq Salem Alzboon
Mohammad Subhi Al-Batah
Jadara University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alzboon et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a76076c6e9836116a2d387 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-026-08353-2