Incorrect formula for calculation of likelihood ratios used in forensic anthropology: Comments on Scott & Rogers (2026)

Key Points

• The comments point out critical errors in the calculation of likelihood ratios, compromising forensic analysis.
• Specifically, incorrect formulas risk misleading outcomes in forensic anthropology settings.
• Observational analysis examines the implications of statistical mistakes on forensic work with potential real-world impacts.
• Consequently, effective forensic anthropology depends on accurate statistical methods and validation of frameworks.