Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations have a poor prognosis, even after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Targeted maintenance therapy with gilteritinib is now recommended post-HSCT in de novo measurable residual disease-positive FLT3mut+ AML patients. However, the benefits of post-HSCT gilteritinib maintenance in relapsed and refractory (R/R) disease are less clear. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines to collate and describe the body of evidence (from inception of databases to April 29, 2024) assessing the clinical outcomes of gilteritinib post-HSCT therapy in patients with R/R FLT3mut+ AML. Eight studies (2 randomized controlled; 6 observational) reporting clinical outcomes in a total of 134 adult patients with FLT3mut+ AML were included in the narrative synthesis. Six were single-arm studies, and 2 included a comparator group without maintenance therapy after transplantation. From time of HSCT, 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates ranged from 72.3 % to 100 % (n = 55) and 55.8 % to 60.0 % (n = 41), respectively, and 1- and 2-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 46.7 %-100.0 % (n = 27) and 46.7 %-80.0 % (n = 13), respectively. Comparative data suggest that gilteritinib as post-HSCT maintenance therapy may improve clinical outcomes of patients with R/R FLT3mut+ AML versus no gilteritinib maintenance. However, no definite conclusions can be drawn from the limited clinical data available in this setting. Further well-designed studies with uniformity in defining OS and RFS are required to provide further insight into this strategy for the high-risk R/R FLT3mut+ AML population.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hsin-An Hou
Bartlomiej Getta
Jae-Sook Ahn
Leukemia Research
National Taiwan University Hospital
Liverpool Hospital
Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hou et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a76088c6e9836116a2d5f9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2026.108186