In this paper, we present a comparative performance analysis of the POKÉ-based key exchange and SIDH variants. SIDH gained attention for its small key size and efficient performance, and has been selected as an alternate candidate in NIST PQC Round 4. However, following the key recovery attack by Castryck and Decru in 2022, SIDH was shown to be vulnerable to polynomial-time attacks on classical computers, undermining its security and removing it from consideration. Given that SIDH was regarded as the leading isogeny-based algorithm, several countermeasures, such as MSIDH, MD-SIDH, and bin/terSIDH have been proposed. However, these approaches still face performance limitations. Meanwhile, POKÉ, proposed by Basso and Maino at Eurocrypt 2025, is an isogeny-based public key encryption scheme that combines a SIDH-like protocol with higher-dimensional isogenies and has drawn attention for its efficient performance. In this work, we adapt POKÉ into a key exchange algorithm and benchmark it against M-SIDH, terSIDH, and CSIDH. Targeting NIST security level 1, POKÉ-based KEM is approximately 21.21 times faster than terSIDH and 64.97 times faster than CSIDH, showing that the POKÉ-based KEM is currently the most promising isogeny-based key exchange candidate.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hyeonhak Kim
S. Kim
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
IEEE Access
Korea University
Sungshin Women's University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kim et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a760c5c6e9836116a2dd4b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2026.3660893