Insulin remains one of the most essential yet fragile biopharmaceuticals used in modern medicine. Globally, 150 million people with diabetes depend on exogenous insulin to regulate blood glucose levels, but the protein's inherent instability can cause degradation during storage or transport. These degradation events can reduce insulin's potency and safety, yet patients and healthcare providers currently have no practical means to assess insulin quality before injection. This knowledge gap contributes to inconsistent therapeutic outcomes and increases the risk of complications associated with degraded insulin. Our work directly addresses this unmet clinical and public health need by identifying the molecular changes that occur when insulin analogs are exposed to everyday environmental stressors and by completing proof-of-concept testing for a device to detect insulin fibrillation. We demonstrate that structural transitions to fibrils precede measurable loss of bioactivity and that fibrillation behavior depends on both the insulin analog and the stressor type. By combining biochemical characterization with antibody-based detection, this study establishes a foundation for a low-cost, accessible method to verify insulin integrity outside the laboratory. Such a tool could prevent the use of degraded insulin, improve treatment consistency, and empower patients to ensure the quality of their medication. More broadly, this approach exemplifies how protein stability monitoring can be integrated into biotherapeutic quality assurance, improving safety, efficacy, and trust in life-sustaining biologic medicines.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David Ritz
Elizabeth-Lauren Stevenson
Daniel Schultz
Dartmouth College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ritz et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a76136c6e9836116a2eec8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.12.705529
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: