Mechanistic models in systems biology enable biophysically-backed testing of hypothesised mechanisms. However, determination of their parameter values is highly challenging, and the data available for calibration is frequently qualitative in nature. Acknowledging this, many approaches abandon mechanistic description, avoiding parameterisation and simulating biological network behaviours in a qualitative fashion. Appealing are the methods that capture some of the best of both types of approach, maintaining a qualitative perspective while using mechanistic models that naturally generalise to quantitative data and carry biochemical implications. Here, using a pea branching network model as an exemplar, we demonstrate the conversion of biological hypotheses into simplified, parameter-free mathematical models, elucidating the biophysical assumptions implicitly made by this approach and analysing the exemplar model's behaviour. Using likelihood-free Bayesian calibration, we compare the parameter-free model to the set of plausible calibrations of its parameterised analog, hence demonstrating that almost all of the qualitative conclusions given data - including both suitability of a hypothesised network structure, and sensitivity analysis - are obtained by the parameter-free paradigm. Altogether, our findings highlight the usefulness of parameter-free treatments of quantitative models, and also deepen understanding of branching network function across mutant and grafted plants.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Brodie A J Lawson
Elizabeth A. Dun
Christine A. Beveridge
Mathematical Biosciences
Queensland University of Technology
ARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lawson et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a765c4badf0bb9e87da5bd — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2026.109635