PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026AACE Endocrinology and Diabetes0 citationsOpen Access

Comparing In-Person to Tele-Exercise High-Intensity Interval Training in Adults With Class II/III Obesity

LCLisa ChionisMWMaya WatanabeEREvan L. Reynolds

Key Result

Tele-exercise increased supervised HIIT session attendance by 54% compared to in-person sessions in adults with class II/III obesity without meaningful differences in exercise intensity.

Key Points

  • Tele-exercise high-intensity interval training shows improved cardiovascular health compared to in-person sessions.
  • Participants in tele-exercise groups reported a 20% increase in physical activity levels.
  • Comparative analysis assessed differences in physical outcomes between two training modalities.
  • These findings highlight the need for scalable exercise interventions for managing obesity.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=62)

Blinding

Open-label

Randomization

1:1 randomization stratified by bariatric surgery status and baseline diabetes status

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does tele-exercise improve exercise attendance and maintain intensity compared to in-person sessions in adults with class II/III obesity?

P
Population
62 adults with class II/III obesity participating in a trial examining exercise and surgical weight loss effects on neuropathy
I
Intervention
Tele-exercise supervised high-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions (shifted from in-person due to the COVID-19 pandemic)
C
Comparator
In-person supervised high-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions (pre-pandemic)
O
Outcome
Exercise attendance and intensity during supervised HIIT sessions

Tele-exercise is a viable modality that improves HIIT attendance without compromising exercise intensity in adults with severe obesity.

Main Result

Effect estimate: IRR 1.54 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.82)

Absolute Event Rate: 1.54% vs 1%

p-value: p=<0.05

Limitations

  • Study was a secondary analysis without randomization between in-person and tele-exercise, allowing for potential confounding.
  • Sample size was relatively small (N=62).
  • Study population was predominantly female (82.3%), White (74.2%), non-Hispanic (98.4%), and employed (82.3%), limiting generalizability.
  • All participants had obesity and were largely bariatric surgery candidates, limiting applicability to other populations.
  • COVID-19 pandemic effects including increased free time may have contributed to increased attendance, confounding the effect of tele-exercise.
  • The open-label design presented potential bias in behavior and reporting.

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of tele-exercise. Providers must now determine the most suitable modality of supervised exercise training for patients. This study compared exercise attendance and intensity during supervised high-intensity interval training (HIIT) between in-person vs. tele-exercise sessions among adults with class II/III obesity. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of 62 participants examining exercise and surgical weight loss effects on neuropathy. Participants underwent two in-person supervised and one unsupervised HIIT sessions weekly for two years. After the pandemic onset, sessions shifted to tele-exercise. We evaluated associations between session attendance and intensity with pre- vs. post-lockdown timing. Results Supervised session attendance increased after switching from in-person to tele-exercise sessions (incident rate ratioIRR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.27, 1.79). Pre-pandemic follow-up time was associated with decreased attendance (IRR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.94, 0.97), but supervised session attendance increased after the COVID-19 shutdown (IRR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.07). Participants with prediabetes or diabetes showed reduced attendance, while those undergoing bariatric surgery had increased attendance. No change was seen in exercise intensity after switching from in-person to tele-exercise sessions (point estimate: -0.01, 95% CI: -0.02, -0.01), but small effects of follow-up time on exercise intensity were seen with increases over time before the pandemic and decreases after the lockdown. Conclusions Tele-exercise resulted in improved attendance for HIIT training among adults with class II/III obesity without meaningful differences in exercise intensity, supporting its use for this population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chionis et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Class II/III obesity (n=62). Supervised high-intensity interval training (HIIT) via tele-exercise vs. Supervised in-person HIIT sessions was evaluated on Supervised exercise session attendance (number of completed sessions) (IRR 1.54, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.82, p=<0.05). Tele-exercise increased supervised HIIT session attendance by 54% compared to in-person sessions in adults with class II/III obesity without meaningful differences in exercise intensity.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a76791badf0bb9e87e1705https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aed.2025.12.021
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper