PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems1 citationsOpen Access

Obstacle Avoidance for Human-Centric Environments Using a Modified Artificial Potential Field - Probabilistic Roadmaps Based Planner

SNSai Teja NarendulaABAkhil BandamidapalliGDGokula Vishnu Kirti Damodaran

Key Points

  • The research aims to improve obstacle avoidance for robotic manipulators in environments shared with humans.
  • Developed a modified artificial potential field approach combined with a probabilistic road map planner
  • Utilized RGB and depth information for obstacle representation
  • Compared the proposed method with existing algorithms like RRT and PRM using various metrics
  • The modified APF-PRM showed reduced path length compared to existing methods
  • Demonstrated lower variation in joint angles during path planning
  • Achieved faster planning times, enhancing robotic performance in human-centric environments

Abstract

Serial manipulators are essential for automating tasks and working alongside humans in the fields of automotive, pharmaceutical, retail, and research. However, there is a significant challenge to ensuring both human safety and efficient operation. This paper tackles this challenge by introducing an improved approach that combines the Modified Artificial Potential Field (APF) method with a Probabilistic Road Maps (PRM) planner, utilizing an optimization-based pose estimation model approach to represent human obstacles using RGB and depth information. The proposed method is compared with the commonly used Rapidly Exploring Random Tree (RRT) and Probabilistic Road Map (PRM) for path planning in environments where humans are involved. The study focuses on a six-degree-of-freedom serial manipulator wall-mounted on a flat surface. By comparing the proposed approach with existing planning algorithms, the paper analyzes the developed Modified APF-PRM and its performance based on metrics such as path length, variation of joint angles, and time taken for path planning. The paper concludes with a discussion of potential improvements and refinements for algorithms based on the results of this study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Narendula et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7ccc3d48f933b5eed8969https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-025-02311-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper