PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Current History0 citations

Rampant Nativism

View Full Paper
JKJosip KešićJDJan Willem Duyvendak

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the rise of nativism in the Netherlands and its implications for social cohesion. It examines how progressive values are co-opted by nativist movements.
  • Analyzed different subtypes of nativism: religious, racial, and populist.
  • Examined shifts in public discourse and formal political reactions.
  • Investigated the normalization of nativism within the Dutch context.
  • Identified three interrelated subtypes of nativism targeting Muslims, non-whites, and elites.
  • Noted a shift in public discourse, including among traditionally progressive groups.
  • Claimed that right-wing nativism has appropriated progressive values for exclusionary tactics.

Abstract

This article addresses contemporary nativism in the Netherlands, precisely because it has been considered an unlikely place for the rise of such exclusionary politics given its reputation for progressiveness and tolerance. We dissect nativism into three different but interrelated subtypes characterized by different primary targets: religious nativism (Muslims), racial nativism (non-whites), and populist nativism (elites). We claim that nativism has been normalized, a process visible in formal politics and shifts in public discourse, including among the left. We also argue that progressive values have been appropriated by right-wing nativism in service of its exclusionary, essentializing politics. If it can happen in the Netherlands, it can happen anywhere.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kešić et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7ccd5d48f933b5eed89abhttps://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2026.125.869.111
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper