PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Consciousness and Cognition0 citationsOpen Access

Eye movements reflect thought patterns while listening to literary narratives

View Full Paper
DMDiane Caroline MézièreJKJohanna K. KaakinenJLJarkko Lehtola

Key Points

  • The study investigates how eye movements reflect thought patterns experienced by listeners during audiobook sessions.
  • Participants listened to an audiobook and completed a mind-wandering questionnaire.
  • Eye movements were recorded while participants focused on a fixation cross on a screen.
  • Principal components analysis identified components of thought patterns related to immersion, mind-wandering, and sub-vocalization.
  • Higher immersion resulted in fewer, less dispersed fixations and shorter saccades.
  • Mind-wandering was associated with more dispersed fixations on the screen.
  • Sub-vocalization led to increased number of fixations and blinks, and higher fixation dispersion.

Abstract

• Listeners experience different types of thoughts while listening to literary texts. • These thoughts are similar to those experienced while reading literary texts. • These thought patterns are reflected in eye-movement behaviour. • The dichotomy on/off task does not cover the whole range of thoughts listeners have. • Immersion can positively influence text comprehension outcomes. While listening to an audiobook, listeners’ attention may shift between the text and self-generated thoughts occurring during mind-wandering. Despite the growing use of audiobooks, little is known about how listeners process text when listening to it. The present study investigated the types of thought patterns that listeners have while listening to an audiobook, and whether and how these are reflected in eye movements. Participants (N Study1 = 63, N Study2 = 58) listened to an audio recording of a novel and responded to a 13-item mind-wandering questionnaire and a simple memory question 30 times during the listening task. In study 2, participants’ eye movements were also recorded while they looked at a fixation cross on a screen. A principal components analysis (PCA) of the mind-wandering questionnaire responses produced four components in Study 1, and three components in Study 2. Three components were replicated across the two studies: Immersion, Mind-wandering, and Sub-vocalization. We then examined how these thought patterns were reflected in eye movements in Study 2 including: fixation duration, fixation count, fixation dispersion, saccade amplitude, blink duration, and blink count. The results showed that higher levels of immersion was characterized by fewer and less dispersed fixations on the screen, shorter saccades, and longer blinks. Mind-wandering was related to more dispersed fixations. Sub-vocalization resulted in more fixations, higher dispersion across the screen, and more blinks. The results suggest that eye movements reflect shifts in attentional focus while listening to a literary text. The results provide important information about the processes underlying literary experience.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mézière et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cce8d48f933b5eed8cf7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2026.104031
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper