PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research0 citations

Auditory-Somatosensory Interactions in Speech Perception in Individuals With Hearing Impairment: An Exploratory Case Study

View Full Paper
MAMonica AshokumarJSJean-Luc SchwartzTITakayuki Ito

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the role of orofacial somatosensory inputs in speech perception among individuals with hearing impairment.
  • Participants included 21 French speakers with varying levels of bilateral hearing impairment.
  • Orofacial somatosensory stimulation was applied using a robotic device during a vowel identification task.
  • Comparison made between the performance of hearing-impaired participants and 25 individuals with normal hearing.
  • Hearing ability was assessed through auditory thresholds and audiological profiles.
  • Somatosensory effects varied by hearing ability, identifying three distinct participant profiles.
  • Eight participants with higher noise thresholds but capable of vowel identification showed no somatosensory effect.
  • Thirteen participants unable to identify vowels showed strong somatosensory bias, especially those with long-term hearing device use.
  • Five participants in the second group exhibited no somatosensory effect.

Abstract

Objectives: Individuals with hearing impairment can perceive speech sounds with the help of cochlear implants or hearing aids. Recent studies have shown that orofacial somatosensory inputs may modify speech perception. This study explored the potential role of such somatosensory inputs in speech perception in individuals with hearing impairment. Design: Twenty-one native French-speaking participants with various profiles of bilateral hearing impairment and wearing hearing aids and/or cochlear implants were tested to explore the extent to which an orofacial somatosensory stimulation, consisting in facial skin stretch provided by a robotic device, would affect their speech perception performance in a vowel identification task, in comparison with 25 participants with normal hearing. This potential somatosensory effect was evaluated in relation to their hearing ability assessed by both their hearing threshold of digits in acoustic noise and their audiological profile, and with their production ability assessed by variability in a vowel production task. Results: The somatosensory effects varied depending on participants' hearing ability, with three different profiles. A first group of eight participants, who were able to identify the vowels auditorily though with thresholds in noise higher than for individuals with normal hearing, did not show any somatosensory effect, with identical vowel identification scores without and with facial deformation. The other 13 participants were unable to auditorily identify the vowels and had high thresholds in noise. Among them, eight participants who had used a hearing device for a long duration (≥ 18 years) showed a strong somatosensory bias modifying vowel identification when facial deformation was present. These participants also showed greater variability in vowel production. The last five participants in this second group showed no somatosensory effect at all. Conclusion: These three profiles were related to the role of auditory experience and hearing ability in the development of auditory-somatosensory integration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ashokumar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cd1dd48f933b5eed92d0https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_jslhr-25-00123
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper