PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Education Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

How Children See Geometric Shapes: Eye-Movement Evidence of Developing Structural Reasoning

View Full Paper
MZMaryam ZolfaghariKKKarl W. KoskoHRHadi Rahmati

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how children's geometric reasoning develops through drawing and their eye movements.
  • Employed an exploratory qualitative case study design with three children aged 5.5–7.5.
  • Children completed drawing tasks involving lines, circles, and rectangles while their gaze was recorded.
  • Gaze data, video recordings, and verbal explanations were synchronized and analyzed frame by frame.
  • Identified a progression from partial to full structural awareness in children's eye movements while drawing.
  • Found an intermediate phase where children alternated their gaze-in-activity and made anticipatory fixations.
  • Gaze patterns revealed important transitions in geometric reasoning that standard drawings did not capture.

Abstract

This study investigates how young children’s geometric reasoning develops through the act of drawing, examining how their eye movements, actions, and verbal explanations interact to reveal emerging structural awareness. Grounded in a developmental framework of structural reasoning, the study extends this model from static visual products to the dynamic processes involved in constructing geometric figures. Using an exploratory qualitative case study design, three children (ages 5.5–7.5) completed line, circle, and rectangle drawing tasks while their gaze and actions were recorded using mobile eye-tracking. Gaze data, video recordings, drawing product, and verbal responses were synchronized and analyzed frame by frame to examine gaze–action coordination. Analysis revealed a progression from partial structural awareness, where gaze remained embedded in action, to structural awareness, where gaze projected multiple steps ahead to coordinate global shape structure. Between these, an intermediate, process-oriented phase was identified, characterized by alternating gaze-in-activity and anticipatory fixations supporting local planning. These fine-grained gaze patterns reveal micro-level transitions in geometric reasoning that are not observable from final drawings alone. The study refines current models of geometric development by revealing how perceptual, representational, and embodied processes dynamically integrate during drawing, offering a more nuanced understanding of early structural reasoning and its implications for teaching geometry.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zolfaghari et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cd1dd48f933b5eed933fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16030377
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Eye tracking technology on children's mathematical education: systematic review2024 · 9 citations
  2. 2Foundations of Embodied Learning2021 · 106 citations
  3. 3Examining Fragmenting Knowledge in First and Second Grade Students: Insights into Fragmenting Developmental Trajectory2025 · 2 citations
  4. 4Effects of Three Interventions on Children's Spatial Structuring and Coordination of Area Units2018 · 17 citations
  5. 5Enacting Elementary Geometry: Participatory ‘Haptic’ Sense-Making2020 · 16 citations