PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

The association of androgen deprivation therapy with time to dementia: A large competing risk analysis.

View Full Paper
MSMichael J. SchellMBMelanie BuhlmannLGLisa M. Gudenkauf

Key Points

  • The study aimed to evaluate the impact of androgen deprivation therapy on dementia risk in prostate cancer patients.
  • Analyzed a large claims database for men diagnosed with prostate cancer aged 40 and older from 2015 to 2021.
  • Employed target trial emulation to assess dementia risk in those receiving androgen deprivation therapy within 180 days of diagnosis.
  • Utilized competing risk analysis to account for death as a confounding factor.
  • 9.4% of patients received androgen deprivation therapy within 180 days of diagnosis.
  • Dementia diagnoses were equal among ADT recipients and non-recipients at 4.2%.
  • No significant association was found between ADT use and dementia risk; however, ADT was linked to a higher risk of death.
  • Racial disparities were noted, with Black and Hispanic patients having a higher risk of dementia.

Abstract

136 Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), used for advanced prostate cancer (PC), has shown mixed associations with dementia in previous studies. We evaluated whether ADT for PC raises the risk of dementia in a large, real-world sample, hypothesizing that patients receiving ADT for PC would have higher odds of dementia compared with PC patients not treated with ADT. Methods: A de-identified open-claims real-world database (NorstellaLinq) included patients age ≥40 years, diagnosed with PC between August 1, 2015, through December 31, 2021, with follow-up data through March 31, 2023. We used target trial emulation, treating the date of PC diagnosis as day 0 and examining whether receiving ADT within 180 days was associated with risk of dementia at ≥365 days. Death was inferred for patients with no claims for ≥12 months. We used competing risk analyses, accounting for death as a competing risk. Covariates included age, presence of metastatic PC, other non-PC cancers, medical comorbidities, and race, derived using an algorithm based on Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding. Results: Of the 1,495,181 patients who met the study criteria, 9.4% received ADT within 180 days after PC diagnosis; 16% died during the study. Dementia diagnoses after day 365 were observed among 4.2% of ADT recipients and 4.2% of patients not treated with ADT. Using ADT within 180 days after PC diagnosis was not associated with dementia (aHR adjusted hazard ratio=0.993, 95% CI 0.97–1.02, p=0.639); ADT was associated with higher adjusted risk of death (aHR=1.268, 95% CI 1.25–1.28, p=3.5e –285 ). Sensitivity analyses found similar results. Compared with White patients, Black (aHR=1.40, 95% CI 1.34–1.46, p=8.9e −54 ) and Hispanic patients (aHR=1.26, 95% CI=1.21–1.32, p=6.7e −23 ) had higher risk of dementia. In analyses examining dementia risk among patients receiving various classes of ADT, patients receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists had higher risk of dementia (aHR=1.05, 95% CI 1.02–1.090) compared to patients not receiving ADT, and patients who received androgen receptor inhibitors (aHR=0.91, 95% CI 0.86–0.95) or androgen synthesis inhibitors (aHR=0.85, 95% CI 0.77–0.95) had lower risk of dementia than patients not receiving ADT. Conclusions: Contrary to our hypotheses, we found no increased risk of dementia among PC patients treated with ADT compared with those not treated with ADT in this large, real-world sample. However, future studies should further examine the findings of higher dementia risk among Black and Hispanic patients and among patients receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schell et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cd2ad48f933b5eed940fhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.136
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper