PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026JAMA Neurology3 citations

Catheter Ablation and Oral Anticoagulation for Secondary Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

View Full Paper
KKKazumi KimuraKumamoto University HospitalYNYasuhiro NishiyamaUniversity of FukuiYIY IwasakiNippon Medical School

Key Result

Catheter ablation added to standard therapy did not significantly reduce the primary composite endpoint (HR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.62-2.01) in patients with atrial fibrillation and a recent stroke.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of catheter ablation alongside standard therapy for preventing recurrent strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation and a recent stroke.
  • Open-label, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial
  • Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and recent ischemic stroke received either standard therapy or standard therapy plus catheter ablation
  • Data analyzed after a median follow-up of over 3 years
  • Primary composite end point rates were similar: 4.9% for standard therapy compared to 5.6% for catheter ablation
  • Mortality rates were 1.0 per 100 person-years for standard therapy and 2.8 for catheter ablation
  • Two minor ablation-related adverse events (cardiac tamponade, stroke) were noted (0.8% each)

Structured PICO

Does catheter ablation added to standard therapy reduce the composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, all-cause death, and hospitalization for heart failure in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and a recent history of stroke?

P
Population
249 patients (mean age 71.7, 75.1% male) aged 20-85 years with a definitive diagnosis of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation on electrocardiogram, a history of ischemic stroke, currently receiving or scheduled to receive edoxaban, and having a modified Rankin Scale score of 3 or less. Conducted at 45 sites in Japan.
I
Intervention
Standard therapy plus catheter ablation (performed after ≥4 weeks of edoxaban, within 1-6 months of index stroke onset)
C
Comparator
Standard therapy
O
Outcome
Composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, all-cause death, and hospitalization for heart failurecomposite

In patients with atrial fibrillation and a recent stroke, adding catheter ablation to standard therapy did not significantly reduce the composite risk of recurrent stroke, systemic embolism, death, or heart failure hospitalization, though the study was underpowered.

Limitations

  • The observed event rate was lower than anticipated, suggesting that the study was underpowered to detect clinically meaningful differences.

Abstract

Importance Among patients with atrial fibrillation, those with a recent stroke are at significantly higher risk of recurrence than those without. Catheter ablation is expected to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke, heart failure, and mortality in these patients. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation added to standard therapy for reducing the risk of recurrent stroke or composite outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and a recent history of stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants The Stroke Secondary Prevention With Catheter Ablation and Edoxaban for Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation (STABLED) study was an open-label, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Patients were enrolled from January 2018 to March 2021 and observed until March 2024. This study was conducted at 45 sites in Japan. Patients aged 20 years or older and 85 years or younger and those with a definitive diagnosis of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation on electrocardiogram, a history of ischemic stroke, currently receiving or scheduled to receive edoxaban, and having a modified Rankin Scale score of 3 or less were enrolled. Study data were analyzed from September 2024 to July 2025. Interventions Patients were randomized to receive standard therapy or standard therapy plus catheter ablation (after ≥4 weeks of edoxaban, within 1-6 months of index stroke onset). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was a composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, all-cause death, and hospitalization for heart failure. Safety related to the catheter ablation procedure was assessed. Results A total of 251 patients were enrolled and 249 (mean SD age, 71.7 7.5 years; 187 male 75.1%) were randomized (standard therapy, 124; standard therapy plus catheter ablation, 125). Median follow-up was greater than 3 years. The primary end point occurred at rates of 4.9% and 5.6% per person-year (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.62-2.01) with standard therapy vs catheter ablation, respectively. The respective mortality rates were 1.0 and 2.8 per 100 person-years. Two ablation-related adverse events (cardiac tamponade, stroke) were reported (0.8% each). Conclusions and Relevance In patients with atrial fibrillation and a recent stroke history, standard therapy plus catheter ablation did not significantly reduce the risk of the primary composite end point. The observed event rate was lower than anticipated, suggesting that the study was underpowered to detect clinically meaningful differences. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03777631

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kimura et al. (2026) studied this question. Catheter ablation added to standard therapy did not significantly reduce the primary composite endpoint (HR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.62-2.01) in patients with atrial fibrillation and a recent stroke.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cd5ed48f933b5eed99c0https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.0155
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper