PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Applied Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

TFS Point-on-Hand Sign Recognition Using Part Affinity Fields

View Full Paper
JSJinnavat SanalohitTKTatpong Katanyukul

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop an effective framework for recognizing point-on-hand signing in Thai Finger Spelling using Part Affinity Fields.
  • Utilized a bottom-up design for keypoint regression using Part Affinity Fields (PAFs)
  • Examined the effectiveness of recognizing static point-on-hand signs in Thai Sign Language
  • Compared performance with existing techniques, specifically MediaPipe Hands (MPH) and X-Pose.
  • Achieved 72% accuracy in sign recognition with PAFs
  • Noticed improvements over MPH (58%) and X-Pose (47%) but identified limitations in generalization
  • Confirmed challenges linked to hand-to-hand interactions in sign language.

Abstract

Our study investigates an application of a bottom-up design for keypoint regression, Part Affinity Fields (PAFs), for sign language recognition. Automatic sign language recognition could facilitate communication between deaf people and the hearing majority. Sign languages generally employ both semantic and finger-spelling signing. Semantic signing includes acting out to convey meaning, while finger spelling complements signing through the spelling out of proper names. Specifically, this article addresses an automatic recognition framework for the static point-on-hand (PoH) signing of Thai Finger Spelling (TFS)—the finger-spelling part of Thai Sign Language (TSL). From a pattern recognition perspective, PoH signing is quite distinct among signing schemes for requirement of precise localization of key parts on the signing hands. A recent study addressed PoH using an off-the-shelf version of MediaPipe Hands (MPH) and found shortcomings particularly when there was a high degree of hand-to-hand interaction. The top-down design of MPH was hypothesized to be the culprit. Our study investigates a bottom-up design, Part Affinity Fields (PAFs), along with examination of the related factors. The results support the hypothesis of a high-degree of hand-to-hand interaction posited by the MPH study. However, the overall performance of the PAF-based approach is shown to be modestly effective (72% accuracy vs. 58% and 47% of the MPH- and X-Pose-based approaches). In addition, its generalization is shown to be lacking. Thus TFS point-on-hand sign recognition remains a challenge.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sanalohit et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cd6ed48f933b5eed9b7ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/app16052416
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper